» Articles » PMID: 34021062

Effects of Electronic Cigarettes and Hookah (waterpipe) Use on Home Air Quality

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 May 22
PMID 34021062
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: A major site of secondhand smoke exposure for children and adults is the home. Few studies have evaluated the impact of e-cigarette or hookah use on home air quality, despite evidence finding toxic chemicals in secondhand e-cigarette aerosols and hookah smoke. We assessed the effect of e-cigarette and hookah use on home air quality and compared it with air quality in homes where cigarettes were smoked and where no smoking or e-cigarette use occurred.

Methods: Non-smoking homes and homes where e-cigarettes, hookah or cigarettes were used were recruited in the New York City area (n=57) from 2015 to 2019. Particulate matter with diameter less than 2.5 µm (PM), black carbon and carbon monoxide (CO) were measured during a smoking or vaping session, both in a 'primary' smoking room and in an adjacent 'secondary' room where no smoking or vaping occurred. Log transformed data were compared with postanalysis of variance Tukey simultaneous tests.

Results: Use of hookah significantly increased PM levels compared with non-smoking homes, in both the primary and secondary rooms, while use of e-cigarettes increased PM levels only in primary rooms. Additionally, in-home use of hookah resulted in greater CO concentrations than the use of cigarettes in primary rooms.

Conclusions: Use of e-cigarettes or hookah increases air pollution in homes. For hookah, increases in PM penetrated even into rooms adjacent to where smoking occurs. Extending smoke-free rules inside homes to include e-cigarette and hookah products is needed to protect household members and visitors from passive exposure to harmful aerosols and gases.

Citing Articles

The Rodent Electronic Nicotine Delivery System: Apparatus for Voluntary Nose-Only E-Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation.

Odum A, Willis-Moore M, Callister K, Haynes J, Frye C, Scribner L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763771 PMC: 11702806. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.21.629932.


Terms tobacco users employ to describe e-cigarette aerosol.

Ebrahimi Kalan M, Lazard A, Sheldon J, Whitesell C, Hall M, Ribisl K Tob Control. 2022; 33(1):15-20.

PMID: 35728932 PMC: 9768092. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057233.


Fine Particulate Matter Exposure From Secondhand Cannabis Bong Smoking.

Nguyen P, Hammond S JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(3):e224744.

PMID: 35353170 PMC: 8968464. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4744.

References
1.
Fernandez E, Ballbe M, Sureda X, Fu M, Salto E, Martinez-Sanchez J . Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015; 2(4):423-9. DOI: 10.1007/s40572-015-0072-x. View

2.
King B, Cummings K, Mahoney M, Juster H, Hyland A . Multiunit housing residents' experiences and attitudes toward smoke-free policies. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010; 12(6):598-605. PMC: 3436441. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq053. View

3.
Montazeri Z, Nyiraneza C, El-Katerji H, Little J . Waterpipe smoking and cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2016; 26(1):92-97. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052758. View

4.
Brinkman M, Kim H, Buehler S, Adetona A, Gordon S, Clark P . Evidence of compensation among waterpipe smokers using harm reduction components. Tob Control. 2018; 29(1):15-23. PMC: 7350613. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054502. View

5.
Flouris A, Chorti M, Poulianiti K, Jamurtas A, Kostikas K, Tzatzarakis M . Acute impact of active and passive electronic cigarette smoking on serum cotinine and lung function. Inhal Toxicol. 2013; 25(2):91-101. DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2012.758197. View