» Articles » PMID: 34020170

Wearable Activity Trackers for Promoting Physical Activity: A Systematic Meta-analytic Review

Overview
Date 2021 May 21
PMID 34020170
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Although wearable activity trackers hold a promise of nudging people toward a more active lifestyle, current research reveals inconsistent findings regarding the effectiveness of them. The objectives of this paper are two-fold: (1) to synthesize evidence on the effects of wearable activity trackers for improving physical activities, and (2) to identify potential moderators of effect size.

Methods: A systematic meta-analytic review was conducted. Forty-eight eligible papers based on forty-four distinct trials were identified through a systematic literature search process. Two authors independently extracted information from each study based on predefined data fields. Random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analysis were employed.

Results: First, interventions with wearable activity trackers significantly increased daily steps and weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity but had no impact on light physical activity or sedentary behavior. Second, daily steps and weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were associated with participants' characteristics (i.e., gender, age, medical condition, and baseline physical activity level) and intervention features (i.e., sensors, modes of expert support, and intervention duration). The identified factors explained 53 % of the total variance for weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Conclusions: The use of wearable activity trackers effectively improves conscious exercise behavior, including daily steps and weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, but not effective for modifying habitual behavior, such as light physical activity and sedentary behavior. We also explicitly show that the extent to which the interventions with wearable activity trackers help users is contingent on the type of users and the design and delivery of interventions. Future studies are called to validate the findings and to offer theoretical explanations.

Citing Articles

A structured, home-based exercise programme in kidney transplant recipients (ECSERT): A randomised controlled feasibility study.

Billany R, Macdonald J, Burns S, Chowdhury R, Ford E, Mubaarak Z PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316031.

PMID: 39992959 PMC: 11849866. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316031.


Digital Health Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Semiquantitative Analysis.

Di Pumpo M, Miatton A, Riccardi M, Graps E, Baldo V, Buja A Int J Public Health. 2025; 69():1607720.

PMID: 39830161 PMC: 11738617. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607720.


The Effect of Activity Tracking Apps on Physical Activity and Glycemic Control in People with Prediabetes Compared to Normoglycemic Individuals: A Pilot Study.

Kalampoki A, Ntzani E, Asimakopoulos A, Liberopoulos E, Tentolouris N, Anastasiou G Nutrients. 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796569 PMC: 11722914. DOI: 10.3390/nu17010135.


Effects of self-monitoring physical activity with wearable activity trackers on perceived joint function and health-related quality of life in people with hip and knee osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised clinical trial.

Ostlind E, Eek F, Stigmar K, Ekvall Hansson E BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):33.

PMID: 39789623 PMC: 11715198. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08238-8.


Development of a wearable activity tracker based on BBC micro:bit and its performance analysis for detecting bachata dance steps.

Avci K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30700.

PMID: 39730411 PMC: 11680584. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78064-4.