» Articles » PMID: 34018624

Randomization-based Inference for a Marginal Treatment Effect in Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 21
PMID 34018624
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (SWT), clusters are randomized to crossover from control to intervention at different time periods and outcomes are assessed for a different set of individuals in each cluster-period. Randomization-based inference is an attractive analysis strategy for SWTs because it does not require full parametric specification of the outcome distribution or correlation structure and its validity does not rely on having a large number of clusters. Existing randomization-based approaches for SWTs, however, either focus on hypothesis testing and omit technical details on confidence interval (CI) calculation with noncontinuous outcomes, or employ weighted cluster-period summary statistics for p-value and CI calculation, which can result in suboptimal efficiency if weights do not incorporate information on varying cluster-period sizes. In this article, we propose a framework for calculating randomization-based p-values and CIs for a marginal treatment effect in SWTs by using test statistics derived from individual-level generalized linear models. We also investigate how study design features, such as stratified randomization, subsequently impact various SWT analysis methods including the proposed approach. Data from the XpertMTB/RIF tuberculosis trial are reanalyzed to illustrate our method and compare it to alternatives.

Citing Articles

Maintaining the validity of inference from linear mixed models in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials under misspecified random-effects structures.

Ouyang Y, Taljaard M, Forbes A, Li F Stat Methods Med Res. 2024; 33(9):1497-1516.

PMID: 38807552 PMC: 11499024. DOI: 10.1177/09622802241248382.


Permutation-based multiple testing corrections for -values and confidence intervals for cluster randomized trials.

Watson S, Akinyemi J, Hemming K Stat Med. 2023; 42(21):3786-3803.

PMID: 37340888 PMC: 10962558. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9831.


Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Methodological Overview.

Li F, Wang R World Neurosurg. 2022; 161:323-330.

PMID: 35505551 PMC: 9074087. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.136.

References
1.
Ford W, Westgate P . Improved standard error estimator for maintaining the validity of inference in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters. Biom J. 2017; 59(3):478-495. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201600182. View

2.
Kalish L, Begg C . The impact of treatment allocation procedures on nominal significance levels and bias. Control Clin Trials. 1987; 8(2):121-35. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90037-7. View

3.
Rabideau D, Wang R . Randomization-based confidence intervals for cluster randomized trials. Biostatistics. 2020; 22(4):913-927. PMC: 8511941. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa007. View

4.
Kennedy-Shaffer L, de Gruttola V, Lipsitch M . Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Stat Med. 2019; 39(7):815-844. PMC: 7247054. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8451. View

5.
Hooper R, Teerenstra S, de Hoop E, Eldridge S . Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials. Stat Med. 2016; 35(26):4718-4728. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7028. View