» Articles » PMID: 34014931

Comparison the Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy with Carotid Artery Stenting for Contralateral Carotid Occlusion

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 May 20
PMID 34014931
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There have been inconsistent results regarding the use of carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) versus carotid artery stenting (CAS) for contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO). This study aimed to determine the optimal revascularization technique for patients with CCO.

Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies published from inception to January 2, 2021. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate pooled effect estimates using a random-effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup, and publication bias analyses were also performed.

Results: Six studies involving 6,953 patients were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that while CEA was not associated with an increased risk of stroke compared to CAS (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.75-1.51; P = 0.713), CEA was associated with a reduced risk of death compared to CAS (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.29-0.70; P < 0.001). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between CEA and CAS for the risks of myocardial infarction (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.73-2.62; P = 0.319) or major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.56-1.88; P = 0.926). Finally, the risk of myocardial infarction for CEA versus CAS was affected by disease status, while the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was affected by the proportions of patients with male gender, coronary artery disease, and current or prior smoking.

Conclusion: This study found that CEA and CAS resulted in similar outcomes for patients with CCO, while the risk of death was reduced in patients treated with CEA. Further high-level evidence should be collected to verify the results of this study.

Citing Articles

Is a Carotid Doppler Scan Useful for Managing Patients with Suspected Ocular Ischemic Syndrome?.

Gkiala A, Zaheer N, Anwar S, Perera S, Sharara A, Lip P Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:2041-2048.

PMID: 39044766 PMC: 11265215. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S467513.


Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke as "surgeons affairs": a narrative review.

Caproni S, Ottavi P, Borghetti V, Taddei G, Conti C, Riva A Neurol Sci. 2023; 44(12):4233-4245.

PMID: 37542547 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06985-5.

References
1.
DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

2.
. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1995; 273(18):1421-8. View

3.
Blaser T, Hofmann K, Buerger T, Effenberger O, Wallesch C, Goertler M . Risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and vessel occlusion before endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2002; 33(4):1057-62. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000013671.70986.39. View

4.
Texakalidis P, Giannopoulos S, Kokkinidis D, Karasavvidis T, Rangel-Castilla L, Reavey-Cantwell J . Carotid Artery Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting for Patients with Contralateral Carotid Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018; 120:563-571.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.183. View

5.
Huibers A, Calvet D, Kennedy F, Czuriga-Kovacs K, Featherstone R, Moll F . Mechanism of Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting Within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) Randomised Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; 50(3):281-8. PMC: 4580136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.05.017. View