Linking Genome Size Variation to Population Phenotypic Variation Within the Rotifer, Brachionus Asplanchnoidis

Overview

Journal Commun Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2021 May 20

PMID 34011946

Citations 8

Authors

Claus-Peter Stelzer

Maria Pichler

Anita Hatheuer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Eukaryotic organisms usually contain much more genomic DNA than expected from their biological complexity. In explaining this pattern, selection-based hypotheses suggest that genome size evolves through selection acting on correlated life history traits, implicitly assuming the existence of phenotypic effects of (extra) genomic DNA that are independent of its information content. Here, we present conclusive evidence of such phenotypic effects within a well-mixed natural population that shows heritable variation in genome size. We found that genome size is positively correlated with body size, egg size, and embryonic development time in a population of the monogonont rotifer Brachionus asplanchnoidis. The effect on embryonic development time was mediated partly by an indirect effect (via egg size), and a direct effect, the latter indicating an increased replication cost of the larger amounts of DNA during mitosis. Our results suggest that selection-based change of genome size can operate in this population, provided it is strong enough to overcome drift or mutational change of genome size.

Citing Articles

Quantifying the role of genome size and repeat content in adaptive variation and the architecture of flowering time in Amaranthus tuberculatus.

Kreiner J, Hnatovska S, Stinchcombe J, Wright S PLoS Genet. 2023; 19(12):e1010865.

PMID: 38150485 PMC: 10775983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010865.

Genome sizes and repeatome evolution in zoantharians (Cnidaria: Hexacorallia: Zoantharia).

Fourreau C, Kise H, Santander M, Pirro S, Maronna M, Poliseno A PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16188.

PMID: 37868064 PMC: 10586311. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16188.

Extensive Copy Number Variation Explains Genome Size Variation in the Unicellular Zygnematophycean Alga, Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale Complex.

Kawaguchi Y, Tsuchikane Y, Tanaka K, Taji T, Suzuki Y, Toyoda A Genome Biol Evol. 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37348049 PMC: 10407611. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evad115.

Meiotic transmission patterns of additional genomic elements in Brachionus asplanchnoidis, a rotifer with intraspecific genome size variation.

Blommaert J, Stelzer C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):20900.

PMID: 36463261 PMC: 9719556. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25566-8.

Genome Size Variation Assessment in L. Landraces in Ibiza and Formentera (Balearic Islands).

Gonzalez R, Valles J, Garnatje T Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35890526 PMC: 9320920. DOI: 10.3390/plants11141892.

References

Petrov D . Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 2002; 61(4):531-44. DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1605. View

Gregory T, Hebert P . The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Genome Res. 1999; 9(4):317-24. View

Bilinski P, Albert P, Berg J, Birchler J, Grote M, Lorant A . Parallel altitudinal clines reveal trends in adaptive evolution of genome size in Zea mays. PLoS Genet. 2018; 14(5):e1007162. PMC: 5944917. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007162. View

Gregory T . Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001; 76(1):65-101. DOI: 10.1017/s1464793100005595. View

Sun Y, Hou X, Xue X, Zhang L, Zhu X, Huang Y . Trade-off between reproduction and lifespan of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis under different food conditions. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):15370. PMC: 5684133. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15863-y. View

Huang W, Massouras A, Inoue Y, Peiffer J, Ramia M, Tarone A . Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines. Genome Res. 2014; 24(7):1193-208. PMC: 4079974. DOI: 10.1101/gr.171546.113. View

Rosetti N, Vilardi J, Remis M . Effects of B chromosomes and supernumerary segments on morphometric traits and adult fitness components in the grasshopper, Dichroplus elongatus (Acrididae). J Evol Biol. 2007; 20(1):249-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01205.x. View

Long Q, Rabanal F, Meng D, Huber C, Farlow A, Platzer A . Massive genomic variation and strong selection in Arabidopsis thaliana lines from Sweden. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(8):884-890. PMC: 3755268. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2678. View

Doolittle W, Brunet T . On causal roles and selected effects: our genome is mostly junk. BMC Biol. 2017; 15(1):116. PMC: 5718017. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-017-0460-9. View

10.

Rosato M, Chiavarino A, Naranjo C, Hernandez J, Poggio L . Genome size and numerical polymorphism for the B chromosome in races of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays, Poaceae). Am J Bot. 2011; 85(2):168. View

11.

Petrov D, Sangster T, Johnston J, Hartl D, Shaw K . Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science. 2000; 287(5455):1060-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5455.1060. View

12.

Gilbert J . Non-genetic polymorphisms in rotifers: environmental and endogenous controls, development, and features for predictable or unpredictable environments. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016; 92(2):964-992. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12264. View

13.

Smarda P, Bures P, Horova L, Rotreklova O . Intrapopulation genome size dynamics in Festuca pallens. Ann Bot. 2008; 102(4):599-607. PMC: 2701780. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn133. View

14.

Kim H, Lee B, Han J, Jeong C, Hwang D, Lee M . The genome of the freshwater monogonont rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. Mol Ecol Resour. 2018; 18(3):646-655. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12768. View

15.

Diez C, Gaut B, Meca E, Scheinvar E, Montes-Hernandez S, Eguiarte L . Genome size variation in wild and cultivated maize along altitudinal gradients. New Phytol. 2013; 199(1):264-276. PMC: 4119021. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12247. View

16.

Gregory T . Insertion-deletion biases and the evolution of genome size. Gene. 2003; 324:15-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.030. View

17.

Stelzer C, Riss S, Stadler P . Genome size evolution at the speciation level: the cryptic species complex Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). BMC Evol Biol. 2011; 11:90. PMC: 3087684. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-90. View

18.

Wong W, Simakov O, Bridge D, Cartwright P, Bellantuono A, Kuhn A . Expansion of a single transposable element family is associated with genome-size increase and radiation in the genus . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(46):22915-22917. PMC: 6859323. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910106116. View

19.

Chia J, Song C, Bradbury P, Costich D, de Leon N, Doebley J . Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(7):803-7. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2313. View

20.

Naville M, Henriet S, Warren I, Sumic S, Reeve M, Volff J . Massive Changes of Genome Size Driven by Expansions of Non-autonomous Transposable Elements. Curr Biol. 2019; 29(7):1161-1168.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.080. View