» Articles » PMID: 34011925

A Small Climate-amplifying Effect of Climate-carbon Cycle Feedback

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 May 20
PMID 34011925
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The climate-carbon cycle feedback is one of the most important climate-amplifying feedbacks of the Earth system, and is quantified as a function of carbon-concentration feedback parameter (β) and carbon-climate feedback parameter (γ). However, the global climate-amplifying effect from this feedback loop (determined by the gain factor, g) has not been quantified from observations. Here we apply a Fourier analysis-based carbon cycle feedback framework to the reconstructed records from 1850 to 2017 and 1000 to 1850 to estimate β and γ. We show that the β-feedback varies by less than 10% with an average of 3.22 ± 0.32 GtC ppm for 1880-2017, whereas the γ-feedback increases from -33 ± 14 GtC K on a decadal scale to -122 ± 60 GtC K on a centennial scale for 1000-1850. Feedback analysis further reveals that the current amplification effect from the carbon cycle feedback is small (g is 0.01 ± 0.05), which is much lower than the estimates by the advanced Earth system models (g is 0.09 ± 0.04 for the historical period and is 0.15 ± 0.08 for the RCP8.5 scenario), implying that the future allowable CO emissions could be 9 ± 7% more. Therefore, our findings provide new insights about the strength of climate-carbon cycle feedback and about observational constraints on models for projecting future climate.

Citing Articles

Stability of gross primary productivity and its sensitivity to climate variability in China.

Xu X, Jiao F, Liu J, Ma J, Lin D, Gong H Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1440993.

PMID: 39309176 PMC: 11412862. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1440993.

References
1.
Ballantyne A, Alden C, Miller J, Tans P, White J . Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years. Nature. 2012; 488(7409):70-2. DOI: 10.1038/nature11299. View

2.
Stocker B, Yu Z, Massa C, Joos F . Holocene peatland and ice-core data constraints on the timing and magnitude of CO emissions from past land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(7):1492-1497. PMC: 5321034. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613889114. View

3.
Shevliakova E, Stouffer R, Malyshev S, Krasting J, Hurtt G, Pacala S . Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(42):16730-5. PMC: 3801041. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314047110. View

4.
Frank D, Esper J, Raible C, Buntgen U, Trouet V, Stocker B . Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate. Nature. 2010; 463(7280):527-30. DOI: 10.1038/nature08769. View

5.
Friedlingstein P . Carbon cycle feedbacks and future climate change. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015; 373(2054). DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0421. View