» Articles » PMID: 34011273

The Influence of the Interval Between Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage and Cholecystectomy on Perioperative Outcomes: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 May 20
PMID 34011273
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is recommended for acute cholecystitis patients at high risk for surgical treatment. However, there is no evidence about the best timing of surgery after PTGBD. Here, we retrospectively investigated the influence of the interval between PTGBD and surgery on perioperative outcomes and examined the optimal timing of surgery after PTGBD.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 22 patients who underwent cholecystectomy after PTGBD from January 2008 to August 2019. We examined perioperative factors between patients with an interval of ≤ 7 days between PTGBD and cholecystectomy (≤ 7-day group; n = 12) and those with an interval of ≥ 8 days (≥ 8-day group; n = 10). Moreover, we also examined perioperative factors between patients with an interval of ≤ 14 days from PTGBD to cholecystectomy (≤ 14-day group; n = 10) and those with an interval of ≥ 15 days (≥ 15-day group; n = 12).

Results: Of the 22 patients, 9 had Grade I cholecystitis, 12 had Grade II cholecystitis, and 2 had Grade III cholecystitis. Nine patients had high-grade cholecystitis before PTGBD and 13 had a poor general condition. We examined perioperative factors between patients with an interval of ≤ 7 days between PTGBD and cholecystectomy (≤ 7-day group; n = 12) and those with an interval of ≥ 8 days (≥ 8-day group; n = 10). The C-reactive protein (CRP) level before surgery was significantly higher (12.70 ± 1.95 mg/dL vs. 1.13 ± 2.13 mg/dL, p = 0.0007) and the total hospitalization was shorter (17.6 ± 8.0 days vs. 54.1 ± 8.8 days, p = 0.0060) in the ≤ 7-day group than in the ≥ 8-day group. We also examined perioperative factors between patients with an interval of ≤ 14 days from PTGBD to cholecystectomy (≤ 14-day group; n = 14) and those with an interval of ≥ 15 days (≥ 15-day group; n = 8). The CRP level before surgery was significantly higher (11.13 ± 2.00 mg/dL vs. 0.99 ± 2.64 mg/dL, p = 0.0062) and the total hospitalization was shorter (19.5 ± 7.2 days vs. 59.9 ± 9.5 days, p = 0.0029) in the ≤ 14-day group than in the ≥ 15-day group. However, there were no significant differences between the ≤ 14-day group and the ≥ 15-day group in the levels of hepatic enzymes before surgery, adhesion grade, amount of bleeding during surgery, operative duration, frequency of surgical complications, or length of hospitalization after surgery.

Conclusions: The interval between PTGBD and surgery has little influence on perioperative outcomes.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous cholecystostomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: Factors influencing mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay.

Teke E, Agca B, Gunes Y, Teke G, Yaz A, Aydin M Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025; 31(1):59-65.

PMID: 39775515 PMC: 11843392. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.94489.


Comparison between percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and upfront laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderate-to-severe acute cholecystitis: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Lee O, Shin Y, Ryu Y, Yoon S, Kim H, Shin S Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023; 105(5):310-318.

PMID: 38023435 PMC: 10648612. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.5.310.


The impact of interval cholecystectomy timing after percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy on post-operative adverse outcomes.

Noubani M, Sethi I, McCarthy E, Stanley S, Zhang X, Yang J Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(12):9132-9138.

PMID: 37814166 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10451-w.


Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of different surgical timing for acute cholecystitis after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang X, Niu X, Tao P, Zhang Y, Su H, Wang X Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):125.

PMID: 36943587 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02861-0.

References
1.
Tsutsui K, Uchida N, Hirabayashi S, Kamada H, Ono M, Ogawa M . Usefulness of single and repetitive percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42(7):583-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-007-2061-9. View

2.
Lau H, Lo C, Patil N, Yuen W . Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2005; 20(1):82-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0100-2. View

3.
Han J, Choi Y, Lee I, Chun H, Choi H, Hong T . Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage is feasible in low-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021; 28(6):515-523. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.921. View

4.
Takada T . Tokyo Guidelines 2018: updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis/acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018; 25(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.526. View

5.
Ogura T, Higuchi K . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: Current status and future prospects. Dig Endosc. 2019; 31 Suppl 1:55-64. DOI: 10.1111/den.13334. View