» Articles » PMID: 34009832

Disruptive Behavior in a High-power Distance Culture and a Three-dimensional Framework for Curbing It

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 May 19
PMID 34009832
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Disruptive behavior can harm high-quality care and is prevalent in many Western public health systems despite increasing spotlight on it. Comparatively less knowledge about it is available in Asia, a region commonly associated with high-power distance, which may limit its effectiveness in addressing disruptive behavior.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive framework for tackling disruptive behavior among health care professionals in a public health system.

Methodology: A nationwide cross-sectional study relying on the Nurse-Physician Relationship Survey was conducted in Singapore. Four hundred eighty-six public health care professionals responded.

Results: Two hundred ninety-eight doctors (95.5%) and 163 nurses (93.7%) had witnessed a form of disruptive behavior. Doctors observed disruptive behavior committed by other doctors and nurses much more frequently than did nurses. Doctors made stronger associations between disruptive behavior and negative employee outcomes and between disruptive behavior and negative patient outcomes. Qualitative analyses of participants' open-ended answers produced a multipronged three-dimensional approach for tackling disruptive behavior: (a) deterrent measures, (b) development of knowledge and skills, and (c) demonstration of organizational commitment through proper norms, empathizing with staff, and structural reforms.

Practice Implications: Disruptive behavior is a multifaceted problem requiring a multipronged approach. Our three-dimensional framework is a comprehensive approach for giving health care professionals the capability, opportunity, and motivation to address disruptive behavior effectively.

Citing Articles

Issues and Perspectives for the Study of Disruptive Clinician Behavior.

Fujimoto M Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63314.

PMID: 38938907 PMC: 11210996. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63314.


Kindness Isn't Just about Being Nice: The Value Proposition of Kindness as Viewed through the Lens of Incivility in the Healthcare Workplace.

Fryburg D Behav Sci (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37366709 PMC: 10295419. DOI: 10.3390/bs13060457.

References
1.
Norful A, Swords K, Marichal M, Cho H, Poghosyan L . Nurse practitioner-physician comanagement of primary care patients: The promise of a new delivery care model to improve quality of care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017; 44(3):235-245. PMC: 5656564. DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000161. View

2.
McKenzie L, Shaw L, Jordan J, Alexander M, OBrien M, Singer S . Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Hospitalwide Intervention to Promote Professionalism and Build a Safety Culture: A Qualitative Study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019; 45(10):694-705. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.07.005. View

3.
Pattani R, Ginsburg S, Johnson A, Moore J, Jassemi S, Straus S . Organizational Factors Contributing to Incivility at an Academic Medical Center and Systems-Based Solutions: A Qualitative Study. Acad Med. 2018; 93(10):1569-1575. PMC: 6159691. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002310. View

4.
Tan K, Lee C . Integration of Primary Care with Hospital Services for Sustainable Universal Health Coverage in Singapore. Health Syst Reform. 2019; 5(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2018.1543830. View

5.
Davies K . The body and doing gender: the relations between doctors and nurses in hospital work. Sociol Health Illn. 2009; 25(7):720-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00367.x. View