» Articles » PMID: 34009470

Partitioning Resilience of a Marine Foundation Species into Resistance and Recovery Trajectories

Abstract

The resilience of an ecological unit encompasses resistance during adverse conditions and the capacity to recover. We adopted a 'resistance-recovery' framework to experimentally partition the resilience of a foundation species (the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa). The shoot abundances of nine seagrass meadows were followed before, during and after simulated light reduction conditions. We determined the significance of ecological, environmental and genetic drivers on seagrass resistance (% of shoots retained during the light deprivation treatments) and recovery (duration from the end of the perturbed state back to initial conditions). To identify whether seagrass recovery was linearly related to prior resistance, we then established the connection between trajectories of resistance and recovery. Finally, we assessed whether recovery patterns were affected by biological drivers (production of sexual products-seeds-and asexual propagation) at the meadow-scale. Resistance to shading significantly increased with the genetic diversity of the meadow and seagrass recovery was conditioned by initial resistance during shading. A threshold in resistance (here, at a ca. 70% of shoot abundances retained during the light deprivation treatments) denoted a critical point that considerably delays seagrass recovery if overpassed. Seed densities, but not rhizome elongation rates, were higher in meadows that exhibited large resistance and quick recovery, which correlated positively with meadow genetic diversity. Our results highlight the critical role of resistance to a disturbance for persistence of a marine foundation species. Estimation of critical trade-offs between seagrass resistance and recovery is a promising field of research to better manage impacts on seagrass meadows.

Citing Articles

Habitat Stability Modulates Temporal β-Diversity Patterns of Seagrass-Associated Amphipods Across a Temperate-Subtropical Transition Zone.

Navarro-Mayoral S, Otero-Ferrer F, Fernandez-Gonzalez V, Bosch N, Fernandez-Torquemada Y, Tomas F Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(12):e70708.

PMID: 39669508 PMC: 11635179. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70708.


2b-RAD Genotyping of the Seagrass Along a Latitudinal Cline Identifies Candidate Genes for Environmental Adaptation.

Ruocco M, Jahnke M, Silva J, Procaccini G, Dattolo E Front Genet. 2022; 13:866758.

PMID: 35651946 PMC: 9149362. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866758.

References
1.
Connell S, Ghedini G . Resisting regime-shifts: the stabilising effect of compensatory processes. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015; 30(9):513-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.014. View

2.
Connell S, Nimmo D, Ghedini G, Nally R, Bennett A . Ecological Resistance - Why Mechanisms Matter: A Reply to Sundstrom et al. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016; 31(6):413-414. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.015. View

3.
Connolly R, Smith T, Maxwell P, Olds A, Macreadie P, Sherman C . Highly Disturbed Populations of Seagrass Show Increased Resilience but Lower Genotypic Diversity. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:894. PMC: 6034141. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00894. View

4.
El-Hacen E, Bouma T, Fivash G, Sall A, Piersma T, Olff H . Evidence for 'critical slowing down' in seagrass: a stress gradient experiment at the southern limit of its range. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):17263. PMC: 6250700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34977-5. View

5.
Erftemeijer P, Lewis 3rd R . Environmental impacts of dredging on seagrasses: a review. Mar Pollut Bull. 2006; 52(12):1553-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.09.006. View