» Articles » PMID: 34008928

Ethnocultural and Socioeconomic Disparities in Exposure to Residential Greenness Within Urban Canada

Overview
Journal Health Rep
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 19
PMID 34008928
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Residential greenness has been associated with health benefits, such as lower risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, obesity, adverse birth outcomes and asthma and better psychological health. However, the variation in greenness across socioeconomic and demographic characteristics in urban areas of Canada has not been well documented.

Data And Methods: Respondents to the 2016 Census long-form questionnaire were assigned estimates of exposure to residential greenness based on the mean Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (from 2012 or the most recent year available) within a 500 m buffer around their home, based on postal code. Census weights were used to determine differences in average exposure to greenness according to selected demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

Results: Mean residential greenness among the 5.3 million census respondents in urban Canada was 0.44 units of the NDVI (standard deviation = 0.18 units). Greenness was lower among immigrants (particularly recent immigrants), some groups designated as visible minorities (particularly people of Filipino ancestry), lower-income households and tenants (i.e., NDVI values ranging from 0.40 to 0.43 units). Greenness values were highest among White non-immigrants and higher-income households (i.e., NDVI values ranging from 0.46 to 0.47 units).

Discussion: Given the potentially multifaceted role that greenness plays in health outcomes, the inequalities in residential greenness described here may contribute to producing or exacerbating existing health inequalities in the Canadian population.

Citing Articles

Editorial: The impact of specific environmental exposures on breast, lung, and colon cancer: advancing public health strategies for enhanced outcomes.

Thakur C, Saran U, Chen F Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1483915.

PMID: 40027496 PMC: 11868267. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1483915.


(Dis)connected by design? Using participatory citizen science to uncover environmental determinants of social connectedness for youth in under-resourced neighbourhoods.

Sones M, Holden M, Kestens Y, King A, Rennie M, Winters M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3104.

PMID: 39529084 PMC: 11552136. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20597-4.


Does urban greenness reduce loneliness and social isolation among Canadians? A cross-sectional study of middle-aged and older adults of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

Villeneuve P, Gill G, Cottagiri S, Dales R, Rainham D, Ross N Can J Public Health. 2023; 115(2):282-295.

PMID: 38158519 PMC: 11006650. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-023-00841-x.


Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users.

Prince S, Lang J, de Groh M, Badland H, Barnett A, Baugh Littlejohns L Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):144.

PMID: 38062460 PMC: 10704660. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01533-y.


Inequalities in Environmental Cancer Risk and Carcinogen Exposures: A Scoping Review.

Larsen K, Rydz E, Peters C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(9).

PMID: 37174236 PMC: 10178444. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20095718.