» Articles » PMID: 34007938

Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress

Overview
Journal Int J Bioprint
Date 2021 May 19
PMID 34007938
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This scientometric analysis of 393 original papers published from January 2000 to June 2019 describes the development and use of bioinks for 3D bioprinting. The main trends for bioink applications and the primary considerations guiding the selection and design of current bioink components (i.e., cell types, hydrogels, and additives) were reviewed. The cost, availability, practicality, and basic biological considerations (e.g., cytocompatibility and cell attachment) are the most popular parameters guiding bioink use and development. Today, extrusion bioprinting is the most widely used bioprinting technique. The most reported use of bioinks is the generic characterization of bioink formulations or bioprinting technologies (32%), followed by cartilage bioprinting applications (16%). Similarly, the cell-type choice is mostly generic, as cells are typically used as models to assess bioink formulations or new bioprinting methodologies rather than to fabricate specific tissues. The cell-binding motif arginine-glycine-aspartate is the most common bioink additive. Many articles reported the development of advanced functional bioinks for specific biomedical applications; however, most bioinks remain the basic compositions that meet the simple criteria: Manufacturability and essential biological performance. Alginate and gelatin methacryloyl are the most popular hydrogels that meet these criteria. Our analysis suggests that present-day bioinks still represent a stage of emergence of bioprinting technology.

Citing Articles

Extrusion bioprinting: meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication?.

Holland I Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol). 2025; 7(2).

PMID: 39904058 PMC: 11894458. DOI: 10.1088/2516-1091/adb254.


Sacrificial Templating for Accelerating Clinical Translation of Engineered Organs.

Malkani S, Prado O, Stevens K ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024; 11(1):1-12.

PMID: 39701582 PMC: 11733865. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01824.


Commercially available bioinks and state-of-the-art lab-made formulations for bone tissue engineering: A comprehensive review.

Chiticaru E, Ionita M Mater Today Bio. 2024; 29:101341.

PMID: 39649248 PMC: 11625167. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101341.


Advances in xenogeneic donor decellularized organs: A review on studies with sheep and porcine-derived heart valves.

Inal M, Avci H, Hassan S, Darcan C, Shin S, Akpek A Bioeng Transl Med. 2024; 9(6):e10695.

PMID: 39545084 PMC: 11558188. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10695.


3D bioprinted breast cancer model reveals stroma-mediated modulation of extracellular matrix and radiosensitivity.

Desigaux T, Comperat L, Dusserre N, Stachowicz M, Lea M, Dupuy J Bioact Mater. 2024; 42:316-327.

PMID: 39290339 PMC: 11405629. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.037.


References
1.
Kilian D, Ahlfeld T, Akkineni A, Bernhardt A, Gelinsky M, Lode A . 3D Bioprinting of osteochondral tissue substitutes - in vitro-chondrogenesis in multi-layered mineralized constructs. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8277. PMC: 7237416. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65050-9. View

2.
Hakimi N, Cheng R, Leng L, Sotoudehfar M, Ba P, Bakhtyar N . Handheld skin printer: in situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues. Lab Chip. 2018; 18(10):1440-1451. PMC: 5965293. DOI: 10.1039/c7lc01236e. View

3.
Liu W, Zhang Y, Heinrich M, De Ferrari F, Lin Jang H, Bakht S . Rapid Continuous Multimaterial Extrusion Bioprinting. Adv Mater. 2016; 29(3). PMC: 5235978. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201604630. View

4.
Lopez-Marcial G, Zeng A, Osuna C, Dennis J, Garcia J, OConnell G . Agarose-Based Hydrogels as Suitable Bioprinting Materials for Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 4(10):3610-3616. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00903. View

5.
Mokhtari H, Kharaziha M, Karimzadeh F, Tavakoli S . An injectable mechanically robust hydrogel of Kappa-carrageenan-dopamine functionalized graphene oxide for promoting cell growth. Carbohydr Polym. 2019; 214:234-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.030. View