» Articles » PMID: 34007895

Reporting of Gestational Diabetes and Other Maternal Medical Conditions: Validation of Routinely Collected Hospital Data from New South Wales, Australia

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 19
PMID 34007895
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Hospital datasets are a valuable resource for examining prevalence and outcomes of medical conditions during pregnancy. To enable effective research and health planning, it is important to determine whether variables are reliably captured.

Objective: To examine the reliability of reporting of gestational and pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, thyroid conditions, and morbid obesity in coded hospital records that inform the population-level New South Wales Admitted Patient Data Collection.

Methods: Coded hospital admission data from two large tertiary hospitals in New South Wales, from 2011 to 2015, were compared with obstetric data, collected by midwives at outpatient pregnancy booking and in hospital after birth, as the reference standard. Records were deterministically linked and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values for the conditions of interest were obtained.

Results: There were 36,051 births included in the analysis. Sensitivity was high for gestational diabetes (83.6%, 95% CI 82.4-84.7%), pre-existing diabetes (88.2%, 95% CI 84.1-91.6%), and gestational hypertension (80.1%, 95% CI 78.2-81.9%), moderate for chronic hypertension (53.5%, 95% CI 47.8-59.1%), and low for thyroid conditions (12.9%, 95% CI 11.7-14.2%) and morbid obesity (9.8%, 95% CI 7.6-12.4%). Specificity was high for all conditions (≥97.8%, 95% CI 97.7-98.0) and positive predictive value ranged from 53.2% for chronic hypertension (95% CI 47.5-58.8%) to 92.7% for gestational diabetes (95% CI 91.8-93.5%).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that coded hospital data are a reliable source of information for gestational and pre-existing diabetes and gestational hypertension. Chronic hypertension is less consistently reported, which may be remedied by grouping hypertension types. Data on thyroid conditions and morbid obesity should be used with caution, and if possible, other sources of data for those conditions should be sought.

Citing Articles

Risk factors and recurrence of hyperemesis gravidarum: A population-based record linkage cohort study.

Pont S, Bond D, Shand A, Khan I, Zoega H, Nassar N Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024; 103(12):2392-2400.

PMID: 39258527 PMC: 11610008. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14966.


The association between psychostimulant use in pregnancy and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: results from a distributed analysis in two similar jurisdictions.

Camacho X, Zoega H, Gomes T, Schaffer A, Henry D, Pearson S Int J Epidemiol. 2022; 52(1):190-202.

PMID: 36135973 PMC: 9908060. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyac180.


Are newly introduced criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus associated with improved pregnancy outcomes and/or increased interventions in New South Wales, Australia? A population-based data linkage study.

Randall D, Morris J, Kelly P, Glastras S BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021; 9(1).

PMID: 34183322 PMC: 8240580. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002277.


Validation of anaemia, haemorrhage and blood disorder reporting in hospital data in New South Wales, Australia.

Baldwin H, Nippita T, Torvaldsen S, McGee T, Rickard K, Patterson J BMC Res Notes. 2021; 14(1):167.

PMID: 33947454 PMC: 8094525. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05584-x.

References
1.
Metzger B, Lowe L, Dyer A, Trimble E, Chaovarindr U, Coustan D . Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(19):1991-2002. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943. View

2.
Luef B, Andersen L, Renault K, Nohr E, Jorgensen J, Christesen H . Validation of hospital discharge diagnoses for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95(11):1288-1294. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13006. View

3.
Reitsma J, Rutjes A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A, Bossuyt P . A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(8):797-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.005. View

4.
Yasmeen S, Romano P, Schembri M, Keyzer J, Gilbert W . Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(4):992-1001. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058. View

5.
Lain S, Hadfield R, Raynes-Greenow C, Ford J, Mealing N, Algert C . Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: a systematic review. Med Care. 2011; 50(4):e7-20. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821d2b1d. View