» Articles » PMID: 34007851

Development and Validation of a Robust Immune-Related Prognostic Signature for Gastric Cancer

Overview
Journal J Immunol Res
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 May 19
PMID 34007851
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: An increasing number of reports have found that immune-related genes (IRGs) have a significant impact on the prognosis of a variety of cancers, but the prognostic value of IRGs in gastric cancer (GC) has not been fully elucidated.

Methods: Univariate Cox regression analysis was adopted for the identification of prognostic IRGs in three independent cohorts (GSE62254, = 300; GSE15459, = 191; and GSE26901, = 109). After obtaining the intersecting prognostic genes, the three independent cohorts were merged into a training cohort ( = 600) to establish a prognostic model. The risk score was determined using multivariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses. Patients were classified into low-risk and high-risk groups according to the median risk score. The risk score performance was validated externally in the three independent cohorts (GSE26253, = 432; GSE84437, = 431; and TCGA, = 336). Immune cell infiltration (ICI) was quantified by the CIBERSORT method.

Results: A risk score comprising nine genes showed high accuracy for the prediction of the overall survival (OS) of patients with GC in the training cohort (AUC > 0.7). The risk of death was found to have a positive correlation with the risk score. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that the risk score was an independent indicator of the prognosis of patients with GC ( < 0.001). External validation confirmed the universal applicability of the risk score. The low-risk group presented a lower infiltration level of M2 macrophages than the high-risk group ( < 0.001), and the prognosis of patients with GC with a higher infiltration level of M2 macrophages was poor ( = 0.011). According to clinical correlation analysis, compared with patients with the diffuse and mixed type of GC, those with the Lauren classification intestinal GC type had a significantly lower risk score ( = 0.00085). The patients' risk score increased with the progression of the clinicopathological stage.

Conclusion: In this study, we constructed and validated a robust prognostic signature for GC, which may help improve the prognostic assessment system and treatment strategy for GC.

Citing Articles

A scoping review of robustness concepts for machine learning in healthcare.

Balendran A, Beji C, Bouvier F, Khalifa O, Evgeniou T, Ravaud P NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):38.

PMID: 39824951 PMC: 11742061. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01420-1.


Development and verification of a manganese metabolism- and immune-related genes signature for prediction of prognosis and immune landscape in gastric cancer.

Han X, Leng C, Zhao S, Wang S, Chen S, Wang S Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1377472.

PMID: 38807601 PMC: 11131102. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1377472.


DNA damage repair molecular subtype derived immune signature applicable for the prognosis and immunotherapy response prediction in colon cancer.

Shang Z, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Liu S Transl Cancer Res. 2023; 12(10):2781-2805.

PMID: 37969400 PMC: 10643980. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-747.


Integrated bioinformatics analysis for conducting a prognostic model and identifying immunotherapeutic targets in gastric cancer.

Liu Y, Li D, Chen Y, Liu Y, Lin Y, Huang X BMC Bioinformatics. 2023; 24(1):191.

PMID: 37161430 PMC: 10170748. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-023-05312-1.


HIF1A overexpression predicts the high lymph node metastasis risk and indicates a poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer.

Zhao Y, Yang Z, Ma L, Wang F, Wang Y, Xiang C Heliyon. 2023; 9(3):e14714.

PMID: 36994412 PMC: 10040699. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14714.


References
1.
. The global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 5(1):42-54. PMC: 7033564. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30328-0. View

2.
Eusebi L, Telese A, Marasco G, Bazzoli F, Zagari R . Gastric cancer prevention strategies: A global perspective. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 35(9):1495-1502. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15037. View

3.
Jung H, Lee H, Song K, Jeon H, Park C . Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer. Cancer. 2013; 117(11):2371-8. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25778. View

4.
Gao L, Wang Q, Ren W, Zheng J, Li S, Dou Z . The RBP1-CKAP4 axis activates oncogenic autophagy and promotes cancer progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020; 11(6):488. PMC: 7316825. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-2693-8. View

5.
Dasgupta A, Shukla S, Vernucci E, King R, Abrego J, Mulder S . SIRT1-NOX4 signaling axis regulates cancer cachexia. J Exp Med. 2020; 217(7). PMC: 7336299. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20190745. View