» Articles » PMID: 34007046

Survival Prediction and Treatment Optimization of Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Machine-learning Models Based on Clinical and Gene Expression Data

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains mostly an incurable disease with a heterogeneous clinical evolution. Despite the availability of several prognostic scores, substantial room for improvement still exists. Promising results have been obtained by integrating clinical and biochemical data with gene expression profiling (GEP). In this report, we applied machine learning algorithms to MM clinical and RNAseq data collected by the CoMMpass consortium. We created a 50-variable random forests model (IAC-50) that could predict overall survival with high concordance between both training and validation sets (c-indexes, 0.818 and 0.780). This model included the following covariates: patient age, ISS stage, serum B2-microglobulin, first-line treatment, and the expression of 46 genes. Survival predictions for each patient considering the first line of treatment evidenced that those individuals treated with the best-predicted drug combination were significantly less likely to die than patients treated with other schemes. This was particularly important among patients treated with a triplet combination including bortezomib, an immunomodulatory drug (ImiD), and dexamethasone. Finally, the model showed a trend to retain its predictive value in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. In conclusion, we report a predictive model for MM survival based on the integration of clinical, biochemical, and gene expression data with machine learning tools.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Bao R, Fan M, Hu M, Li L, Hasichaolu Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025; 31:10760296251316873.

PMID: 39930869 PMC: 11811966. DOI: 10.1177/10760296251316873.


Detection of early relapse in multiple myeloma patients.

Ruzickova T, Vlachova M, Pecinka L, Brychtova M, Vecera M, Radova L Cell Div. 2025; 20(1):4.

PMID: 39881385 PMC: 11776158. DOI: 10.1186/s13008-025-00143-3.


Advancements in Multiple Myeloma Research: High-Throughput Sequencing Technologies, Omics, and the Role of Artificial Intelligence.

Gutierrez-Gonzalez A, Del Hierro I, Cariaga-Martinez A Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596878 PMC: 11592186. DOI: 10.3390/biology13110923.


Recent advances in and applications of ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis for blood cancers.

Lee H, Ko N, Namgoong S, Ham S, Koo J Blood Res. 2024; 59(1):37.

PMID: 39503808 PMC: 11541977. DOI: 10.1007/s44313-024-00032-8.


Joint AI-driven event prediction and longitudinal modeling in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma.

Hussain Z, De Brouwer E, Boiarsky R, Setty S, Gupta N, Liu G NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):200.

PMID: 39075240 PMC: 11286964. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01189-3.


References
1.
Hanbali A, Hassanein M, Rasheed W, Aljurf M, Alsharif F . The Evolution of Prognostic Factors in Multiple Myeloma. Adv Hematol. 2017; 2017:4812637. PMC: 5339490. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4812637. View

2.
Greipp P, San Miguel J, Durie B, Crowley J, Barlogie B, Blade J . International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(15):3412-20. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242. View

3.
Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst H, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L . Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(26):2863-9. PMC: 4846284. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267. View

4.
Chng W, Dispenzieri A, Chim C, Fonseca R, Goldschmidt H, Lentzsch S . IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2013; 28(2):269-77. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.247. View

5.
Kastritis E, Terpos E, Roussou M, Gavriatopoulou M, Migkou M, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou E . Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System in an independent cohort of unselected patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016; 102(3):593-599. PMC: 5394955. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.145078. View