» Articles » PMID: 34001229

Parent Engagement in Co-design of Clinical Trials: the PARENT Trial

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 May 18
PMID 34001229
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence generated from partnering with parents to design and conduct research together may be used to refine, adjust, and modify future research approaches. This study aimed to describe the initial approaches to parent engagement in the design of the PARENT trial as well as understand parent perspectives on the acceptability and relevance of the PARENT trial and potential barriers and facilitators to participation.Parents participating in the TARGet Kids! cohort were invited to participate in a focus group, called the PARENT panel, to co-design the PARENT trial. This focus group was conducted to capture diverse individual and collective parents' experiences. Overall methodological approaches for the PARENT panel were informed by the CIHR Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) guiding principles (mutual respect, co-building, inclusiveness, and support) for patient engagement in research, and facilitated through the Knowledge Translation Program in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at Unity Health Toronto. Using a Nominal Group Technique, the PARENT panel provided feedback on the feasibility, relevance, and acceptability of the proposed intervention. Findings from this work will be used to further refine, adjust, and modify the next iteration of the PARENT trial, which will also serve as an opportunity to discuss the efforts made by researchers to incorporate parent suggestions and what additional steps are required for improved patient engagement.

Citing Articles

The impact of a patient advisory board on a clinical comparative effectiveness trial: a comparison of patient and researcher perspectives.

Kernan L, Pearl M, Harri A, Lambourne C, Schlegel R, Evarts C J Comp Eff Res. 2025; 14(3):e240050.

PMID: 39881634 PMC: 11864086. DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0050.


Parental engagement in research on paediatric lower respiratory tract infections in Indonesia.

Ciptaningtyas V, Sumekar T, de Mast Q, de Jonge M, Margawati A BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):165.

PMID: 38459462 PMC: 10921691. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04648-8.


Participant Perceptions in a Long-term Clinical Trial of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Amin S, Sangadi I, Allman-Farinelli M, Badve S, Boudville N, Coolican H Kidney Med. 2023; 5(9):100691.

PMID: 37602144 PMC: 10432794. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100691.


Factors associated with research participation in a large primary care practice-based pediatric cohort: Results from the TARGet Kids! longitudinal cohort study.

Li X, Keown-Stoneman C, Borkhoff C, Wong P, Arafeh D, Tavares E PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284192.

PMID: 37040376 PMC: 10089319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284192.


Identifying Risk Factors, Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures, and Data Capture Tools for an Individualized Pain Prediction Tool in Pediatrics: Focus Group Study.

Wood M, West N, Sreepada R, Loftsgard K, Petersen L, Robillard J JMIR Perioper Med. 2022; 5(1):e42341.

PMID: 36378509 PMC: 9709673. DOI: 10.2196/42341.

References
1.
Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

2.
Haines J, Rifas-Shiman S, Gross D, McDonald J, Kleinman K, Gillman M . Randomized trial of a prevention intervention that embeds weight-related messages within a general parenting program. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015; 24(1):191-9. PMC: 4847937. DOI: 10.1002/oby.21314. View

3.
Canning P, Courage M, Frizzell L, Seifert T . Obesity in a provincial population of Canadian preschool children: differences between 1984 and 1997 birth cohorts. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007; 2(1):51-7. DOI: 10.1080/17477160601124613. View

4.
Chalmers I, Bracken M, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu A . How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014; 383(9912):156-65. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. View

5.
Ocloo J, Matthews R . From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25(8):626-32. PMC: 4975844. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. View