» Articles » PMID: 33998998

Understanding Barriers to Novel Data Linkages: Topic Modeling of the Results of the LifeInfo Survey

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33998998
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Novel consumer and lifestyle data, such as those collected by supermarket loyalty cards or mobile phone exercise tracking apps, offer numerous benefits for researchers seeking to understand diet- and exercise-related risk factors for diseases. However, limited research has addressed public attitudes toward linking these data with individual health records for research purposes. Data linkage, combining data from multiple sources, provides the opportunity to enhance preexisting data sets to gain new insights.

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify key barriers to data linkage and recommend safeguards and procedures that would encourage individuals to share such data for potential future research.

Methods: The LifeInfo Survey consulted the public on their attitudes toward sharing consumer and lifestyle data for research purposes. Where barriers to data sharing existed, participants provided unstructured survey responses detailing what would make them more likely to share data for linkage with their health records in the future. The topic modeling technique latent Dirichlet allocation was used to analyze these textual responses to uncover common thematic topics within the texts.

Results: Participants provided responses related to sharing their store loyalty card data (n=2338) and health and fitness app data (n=1531). Key barriers to data sharing identified through topic modeling included data safety and security, personal privacy, requirements of further information, fear of data being accessed by others, problems with data accuracy, not understanding the reason for data linkage, and not using services that produce these data. We provide recommendations for addressing these issues to establish the best practice for future researchers interested in using these data.

Conclusions: This study formulates a large-scale consultation of public attitudes toward this kind of data linkage, which is an important first step in understanding and addressing barriers to participation in research using novel consumer and lifestyle data.

Citing Articles

Characterizing co-purchased food products with soda, fresh fruits, and fresh vegetables using loyalty card purchasing data in Montréal, Canada, 2015-2017.

Mamiya H, Crowell K, Mah C, Quesnel-Vallee A, Verma A, Buckeridge D Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):19.

PMID: 39962493 PMC: 11834544. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01701-8.


Participant Contributions to Person-Generated Health Data Research Using Mobile Devices: Scoping Review.

Song S, Ashton M, Yoo R, Lkhagvajav Z, Wright R, Mathews D J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e51955.

PMID: 39832140 PMC: 11791458. DOI: 10.2196/51955.


Development and Evaluation of a Multisource Approach to Extend Mortality Follow-Up for Older Adults With Advanced Cancer Enrolled in Randomized Trials.

Lund J, Cacciatore J, Tylock R, Su I, Sharma S, Peacock Hinton S JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024; 8:e2300183.

PMID: 38564692 PMC: 11000769. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.23.00183.


Assessing household lifestyle exposures from consumer purchases, the My Purchases cohort.

Moller F, Junker T, Sorensen K, Eves C, Wohlfahrt J, Dillner J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21601.

PMID: 38062070 PMC: 10703931. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47534-6.


Assessing the value of integrating national longitudinal shopping data into respiratory disease forecasting models.

Dolan E, Goulding J, Marshall H, Smith G, Long G, Tata L Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7258.

PMID: 37990023 PMC: 10663456. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42776-4.


References
1.
Skatova A, Goulding J . Psychology of personal data donation. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224240. PMC: 6867598. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224240. View

2.
Aitken M, de St Jorre J, Pagliari C, Jepson R, Cunningham-Burley S . Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Ethics. 2016; 17(1):73. PMC: 5103425. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x. View

3.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

4.
Becker W . Comparability of household and individual food consumption data--evidence from Sweden. Public Health Nutr. 2002; 4(5B):1177-82. View

5.
Skatova A, Shiells K, Boyd A . Attitudes towards transactional data donation and linkage in a longitudinal population study: evidence from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Wellcome Open Res. 2021; 4:192. PMC: 7341003. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15557.2. View