» Articles » PMID: 33997780

An Ice Vest, but Not Single-Hand Cooling, Is Effective at Reducing Thermo-Physiological Strain During Exercise Recovery in the Heat

Overview
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33997780
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sports limit the length of breaks between halves or periods, placing substantial time constraints on cooling effectiveness. This study investigated the effect of active cooling during both time-limited and prolonged post-exercise recovery in the heat. Ten recreationally-active adults (VO 43.6 ± 7.5 ml·kg·min) were exposed to thermally-challenging conditions (36°C air temperature, 45% RH) while passively seated for 30 min, cycling for 60 min at 51% VO, and during a seated recovery for 60 min that was broken into two epochs: first 15 min (REC) and total 60 min (REC). Three different cooling techniques were implemented during independent recovery trials: (a) negative-pressure single hand-cooling (~17°C); (b) ice vest; and (c) non-cooling control. Change in rectal temperature ( ), mean skin temperature ( ), heart rate (HR), and thermal sensation (TS), as well as mean body temperature ( ), and heat storage () were calculated for exercise, REC and REC. During REC, HR was lowered more with the ice vest (-9 [-15 to -3] bts·min, = 0.002) and single hand-cooling (-7 [-13 to -1] bts·min, = 0.021) compared to a non-cooling control. The ice vest caused a greater change in compared to no cooling (-1.07 [-2.00 to -0.13]°C, = 0.021) and single-hand cooling (-1.07 [-2.01 to -0.14]°C, = 0.020), as well as a greater change in compared to no cooling (-84 [-132 to -37] W, < 0.0001) and single-hand cooling (-74 [-125 to -24] W, = 0.002). Across REC, changes in (-0.38 [-0.69 to -0.07]°C, = 0.012) and (-1.62 [-2.56 to -0.68]°C, < 0.0001) were greater with ice vest compared to no cooling. Furthermore, changes in in (-0.39 [-0.70 to -0.08]°C, = 0.010) and (-1.68 [-2.61 to -0.74]°C, < 0.0001) were greater with the ice vest compared to single-hand cooling. Using an ice vest during time-limited and prolonged recovery in the heat aided in a more effective reduction in thermo-physiological strain compared to both passive cooling as well as a single-hand cooling device.

Citing Articles

Recovery with a fan-cooling jacket after exposure to high solar radiation during exercise in hot outdoor environments.

Naito T, Saito T, Ohhashi M, Hayashi S Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1106882.

PMID: 36860733 PMC: 9968796. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1106882.

References
1.
Wendt D, van Loon L, van Marken Lichtenbelt W . Thermoregulation during exercise in the heat: strategies for maintaining health and performance. Sports Med. 2007; 37(8):669-82. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200737080-00002. View

2.
Lorenzo S, Halliwill J, Sawka M, Minson C . Heat acclimation improves exercise performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010; 109(4):1140-7. PMC: 2963322. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00495.2010. View

3.
Sunderland C, Stevens R, Everson B, Tyler C . Neck-cooling improves repeated sprint performance in the heat. Front Physiol. 2015; 6:314. PMC: 4633514. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00314. View

4.
Morris C, Atkinson G, Drust B, Marrin K, Gregson W . Human core temperature responses during exercise and subsequent recovery: an important interaction between diurnal variation and measurement site. Chronobiol Int. 2009; 26(3):560-75. DOI: 10.1080/07420520902885981. View

5.
Travers G, Nichols D, Riding N, Gonzalez-Alonso J, Periard J . Heat Acclimation with Controlled Heart Rate: Influence of Hydration Status. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020; 52(8):1815-1824. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002320. View