» Articles » PMID: 33996926

MAP-Elites Enables Powerful Stepping Stones and Diversity for Modular Robotics

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33996926
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In modular robotics modules can be reconfigured to change the morphology of the robot, making it able to adapt to specific tasks. However, optimizing both the body and control of such robots is a difficult challenge due to the intricate relationship between fine-tuning control and morphological changes that can invalidate such optimizations. These challenges can trap many optimization algorithms in local optima, halting progress towards better solutions. To solve this challenge we compare three different Evolutionary Algorithms on their capacity to optimize high performing and diverse morphologies and controllers in modular robotics. We compare two objective-based search algorithms, with and without a diversity promoting objective, with a Quality Diversity algorithm-MAP-Elites. The results show that MAP-Elites is capable of evolving the highest performing solutions in addition to generating the largest morphological diversity. Further, MAP-Elites is superior at regaining performance when transferring the population to new and more difficult environments. By analyzing genealogical ancestry we show that MAP-Elites produces more diverse and higher performing stepping stones than the two other objective-based search algorithms. The experiments transitioning the populations to new environments show the utility of morphological diversity, while the analysis of stepping stones show a strong correlation between diversity of ancestry and maximum performance on the locomotion task. Together, these results demonstrate the suitability of MAP-elites for the challenging task of morphology-control search for modular robots, and shed light on the algorithm's capability of generating stepping stones for reaching high-performing solutions.

Citing Articles

Phenotypic complexity and evolvability in evolving robots.

Milano N, Nolfi S Front Robot AI. 2022; 9:994485.

PMID: 36267423 PMC: 9577008. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.994485.


The Effects of Learning in Morphologically Evolving Robot Systems.

Luo J, Stuurman A, Tomczak J, Ellers J, Eiben A Front Robot AI. 2022; 9:797393.

PMID: 35712548 PMC: 9197197. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.797393.


Multi-Level Evolution for Robotic Design.

Chand S, Howard D Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:684304.

PMID: 34268340 PMC: 8275995. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.684304.

References
1.
Mouret J . Evolving the Behavior of Machines: From Micro to Macroevolution. iScience. 2020; 23(11):101731. PMC: 7662872. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101731. View

2.
Jelisavcic M, Glette K, Haasdijk E, Eiben A . Lamarckian Evolution of Simulated Modular Robots. Front Robot AI. 2021; 6:9. PMC: 7805734. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00009. View

3.
Mouret J, Doncieux S . Encouraging behavioral diversity in evolutionary robotics: an empirical study. Evol Comput. 2011; 20(1):91-133. DOI: 10.1162/EVCO_a_00048. View

4.
Brodbeck L, Hauser S, Iida F . Morphological Evolution of Physical Robots through Model-Free Phenotype Development. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0128444. PMC: 4474803. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128444. View

5.
Cheney N, Bongard J, SunSpiral V, Lipson H . Scalable co-optimization of morphology and control in embodied machines. J R Soc Interface. 2018; 15(143). PMC: 6030623. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0937. View