» Articles » PMID: 33996535

Nomogram Predicts the Role of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Male Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer Based on SEER Database: A Competing Risk Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33996535
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in female breast cancer (FBC) is supported by multiple clinical studies and consensus guidelines, but knowledge of preventive contralateral mastectomy in male breast cancer (MaBC) is very limited and its benefits are still controversial.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was enrolled with 4,405 MaBC patients who underwent unilateral mastectomy (UM) or CPM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1998 to 2015. A nomogram was built based on the corresponding parameters by competing risks regression to predict the 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year probabilities of BCSD (breast cancer-specific death). C-index and calibration curves were chosen for validation. Net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to estimate the nomogram's clinical utility.

Results: A total of 4,197 patients received UM and 208 patients received CPM, with 63-months median follow-up. In the competing risks regression, six variables (surgery, marital status, T-stage, N-stage, histology, tumor grade) were significantly associated with BCSD. Based on these independent prognosis factors, a nomogram model was constructed. The C-index 0.75 (95%CI: 0.73-0.77) in the training cohort and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.71-0.74) in the internal validation group suggested robustness of the model. In addition, the calibration curves exhibited favorably. The NRI values (training cohort: 0.54 for 3-year, 0.55 for 5-year, and 0.49 for 8-year BCSD prediction; validation cohort: 0.51 for 3-year, 0.45 for 5-year, and 0.33 for 8-year BCSD prediction) and IDI values (training cohort: 0.02 for 3-year, 0.03 for 5-year, and 0.04 for 8-year BCSD prediction; validation cohort: 0.02 for 3-year, 0.04 for 5-year, and 0.04 for 8-year BCSD prediction) indicated that the model performed better than the AJCC criteria-based tumor staging alone.

Conclusions: The administration of CPM was associated with the decrease in risk of BCSD in patients with MaBC. The nomogram could provide a precise and personalized prediction of the cumulative risk in patients with MaBC after CPM.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting sever cancer-related fatigue in patients with cervical cancer.

Gu Z, Yang C, Zhang K, Wu H BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):492.

PMID: 38637740 PMC: 11025233. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12258-x.


Male Breast Cancer: An Updated Review of Patient Characteristics, Genetics, and Outcome.

Khare V, Huda F, Misra S, Amulya K, Raj N, Karn S Int J Breast Cancer. 2024; 2024:9003572.

PMID: 38559438 PMC: 10981544. DOI: 10.1155/2024/9003572.


A nomogram for predicting the risk of male breast cancer for overall survival.

Wen Y, Bai J, Zheng C, Liu J, Lin S, Han H Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1068187.

PMID: 37601680 PMC: 10436472. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1068187.


The prognostic significance of further axillary dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases in female breast cancer: A competing risk analysis using the SEER database.

Zhou Y, Pu S, Jiang S, Li D, Li S, Liu Y Front Oncol. 2022; 12:1012646.

PMID: 36465338 PMC: 9713815. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1012646.


Nomogram Predicts the Role of Primary Tumor Surgery on Stage-IV Breast Cancer Patients: A SEER-Based Competing Risk Analysis Model.

Cui H, Dai L, Bao Y, Hu L, Zhou Z, Wang M Front Oncol. 2022; 12:819531.

PMID: 35600374 PMC: 9114756. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.819531.


References
1.
Brewster A, Bedrosian I, Parker P, Dong W, Peterson S, Cantor S . Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status. Cancer. 2012; 118(22):5637-43. PMC: 3478501. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27574. View

2.
Harlan L, Zujewski J, Goodman M, Stevens J . Breast cancer in men in the United States: a population-based study of diagnosis, treatment, and survival. Cancer. 2010; 116(15):3558-68. PMC: 2910812. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25153. View

3.
Pritzlaff M, Summerour P, McFarland R, Li S, Reineke P, Dolinsky J . Male breast cancer in a multi-gene panel testing cohort: insights and unexpected results. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 161(3):575-586. PMC: 5241330. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4085-4. View

4.
Shen W, Sakamoto N, Yang L . Model to Predict Cause-Specific Mortality in Patients with Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Competing Risk Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24(8):2129-2136. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5861-z. View

5.
McDonnell S, Schaid D, Myers J, Grant C, Donohue J, Woods J . Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(19):3938-43. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.19.3938. View