» Articles » PMID: 33995789

The First Biological Choice in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Moroccan Register of Biotherapies

Abstract

Introduction: the aim of our study is to determine, from data of the Moroccan register of biotherapies, the factors influencing the choice of the first prescribed biological treatment.

Methods: cross-sectional multicenter study including rheumatoid arthritis patients who were initiated the first biological treatment either: Rituximab, an anti-TNF, or Tocilizumab. The determinants related to the patient and disease have been gathered. A univariate and then multivariate analysis to determine the factors associated with the choice of the first bDMARDs was realized.

Results: a total of 225 rheumatoid arthritis patients were included in the Moroccan registry. The mean age was 52 ± 11 years, with female predominance 88% (n = 197). The first prescribed biological treatment was Rituximab 74% (n = 166), the second one was Tocilizumab, 13.6% (n = 31) then comes the anti-TNF in 3 position with 12.4% (n = 28). The factors associated with the choice of Rituximab as the first line bDMARDs prescribed in univariate analysis were: the insurance type, the positivity of the rheumatoid factor. In multivariate analysis, only the insurance type that remains associated with the choice of Rituximab as the first biological drugs. The Tocilizumab was associated with shorter disease duration and was more prescribed as mono-therapy compared to non Tocilizumab group. TNFi was associated with the insurance type.

Conclusion: our study suggests that Rituximab and TNFi are associated with the type of insurance and Tocilizumab is the most prescribed biologic mono-therapy in RA patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Citing Articles

Predictors of Drug Retention and Survival Rate of bDMARDs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Four-Year Real-Life Tunisian Experience.

Boussaid S, Tbini H, Rekik S, Khaled S, Rahmouni S, Zouaoui K Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2024; 35(3):448-458.

PMID: 39463880 PMC: 11500116. DOI: 10.31138/mjr.090723.pof.


Rheumatoid arthritis study of the Egyptian College of Rheumatology (ECR): nationwide presentation and worldwide stance.

Gheita T, Raafat H, El-Bakry S, Elsaman A, El-Saadany H, Hammam N Rheumatol Int. 2023; 43(4):667-676.

PMID: 36617362 PMC: 9995404. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05258-2.

References
1.
David J, Mattei R, Mauad J, de Almeida L, Nogueira M, Menolli P . Clinical and laboratory features of patients with rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed at rheumatology services in the Brazilian municipality of Cascavel, PR, Brazil. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2013; 53(1):57-65. DOI: 10.1016/s2255-5021(13)70006-3. View

2.
McInnes I, Schett G . The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(23):2205-19. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965. View

3.
Morsley K, Kilner T, Steuer A . Biologics Prescribing for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Older Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2016; 2(2):165-172. PMC: 4883268. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-015-0021-z. View

4.
Sugihara T, Harigai M . Targeting Low Disease Activity in Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current and Future Roles of Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs. Drugs Aging. 2016; 33(2):97-107. PMC: 4756046. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-015-0341-2. View

5.
Smolen J, Aletaha D, McInnes I . Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016; 388(10055):2023-2038. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8. View