» Articles » PMID: 33995718

Technology Readiness of Medical Students and the Association of Technology Readiness with Specialty Interest

Overview
Journal Can Med Educ J
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33995718
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Technology readiness (TR) is a construct which characterizes an individual's propensity to utilize new technology. Despite increased technology use in healthcare, limited data exists on medical student TR and the relation of TR with specialty interest. This study assesses the TR of 2 year medical students and its association with specialty interest.

Methods: Respondents completed a survey assessing their most preferred specialty, specialty interests, and technology readiness using a 5-point Likert scale. Using Chi-square analysis, we examined the relation between demographics, TR, and specialty interest.

Results: This study obtained a 45.7% ( = 53/116) response rate demonstrating that 79.2% ( = 42/53) of students were "technology ready." Male students were more likely to be technology ready (95.2%, = 20/21, vs 68.8%, = 22/32, = 0.02) when compared to female students. Technology ready students were associated with being more interested in "Technology-Focused" specialties compared to students who were not technology ready (88.5%, = 23/26 vs 70.4%, = 19/27, = 0.104).

Conclusions: As a cohort, most medical students were technology ready. It is inconclusive if technology ready students are more likely to be interested in technology-focused specialties due to the limited sample size of this study, although with an increased sample size, an improved understanding on technology readiness and its potential impact on student specialty interest may be obtained. Furthermore, knowledge of TR may aid in developing targeted technology-based education programs and in improving remedial approaches for students who are less comfortable with new technology.

Citing Articles

Practical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study.

Wosny M, Strasser L, Kraehenmann S, Hastings J JMIR Med Educ. 2024; 10:e60031.

PMID: 39602211 PMC: 11635325. DOI: 10.2196/60031.


Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Education: Perspectives from Pediatric Medical Educators and Residents.

Pudjiadi A, Alatas F, Faizi M, Rusdi , Sulistijono E, Nency Y Healthc Inform Res. 2024; 30(3):244-252.

PMID: 39160783 PMC: 11333820. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.244.


Digital health understanding and preparedness of medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Baumgartner M, Sauer C, Blagec K, Dorffner G Med Educ Online. 2022; 27(1):2114851.

PMID: 36036219 PMC: 9423824. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2114851.


Technology Literacy in Undergraduate Medical Education: Review and Survey of the US Medical School Innovation and Technology Programs.

Wang J, Singh R, Miselis H, Stapleton S JMIR Med Educ. 2022; 8(1):e32183.

PMID: 35357319 PMC: 9015763. DOI: 10.2196/32183.


Coming to terms with the languages we use in medical education: hidden meanings and unintended consequences.

Martimianakis M, DEon M Can Med Educ J. 2021; 12(2):e1-e8.

PMID: 33995714 PMC: 8105578. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.72505.

References
1.
Goncalves-Bradley D, J Maria A, Ricci-Cabello I, Villanueva G, Fonhus M, Glenton C . Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 8:CD012927. PMC: 7437392. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012927.pub2. View

2.
Evans R . Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearb Med Inform. 2016; Suppl 1:S48-61. PMC: 5171496. DOI: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s006. View

3.
Wald H, George P, Reis S, Taylor J . Electronic health record training in undergraduate medical education: bridging theory to practice with curricula for empowering patient- and relationship-centered care in the computerized setting. Acad Med. 2014; 89(3):380-6. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000131. View

4.
Tanenbaum M, Adams R, Lanning M, Hanes S, Agustin B, Naranjo D . Using Cluster Analysis to Understand Clinician Readiness to Promote Continuous Glucose Monitoring Adoption. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018; 12(6):1108-1115. PMC: 6232742. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818786486. View

5.
Fielding J, Major N, Mullan B, Neutze J, Shaffer K, Wilcox C . Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(4):897-900. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0539. View