» Articles » PMID: 33995523

[Contrasting Misinformation and Real-Information Dissemination Network Structures on Social Media During a Health Emergency]

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 17
PMID 33995523
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To provide a comprehensive workflow to identify top influential health misinformation about Zika on Twitter in 2016, reconstruct information dissemination networks of retweeting, contrast mis- from real information on various metrics, and investigate how Zika misinformation proliferated on social media during the Zika epidemic.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the top 5000 English-language Zika tweets, established an evidence-based definition of "misinformation," identified misinformation tweets, and matched a comparable group of real-information tweets. We developed an algorithm to reconstruct retweeting networks for 266 misinformation and 458 comparable real-information tweets. We computed and compared 9 network metrics characterizing network structure across various levels between the 2 groups.

Results: There were statistically significant differences in all 9 network metrics between real and misinformation groups. Misinformation network structures were generally more sophisticated than those in the real-information group. There was substantial within-group variability, too.

Conclusions: Dissemination networks of Zika misinformation differed substantially from real information on Twitter, indicating that misinformation utilized distinct dissemination mechanisms from real information. Our study will lead to a more holistic understanding of health misinformation challenges on social media.

References
1.
Signorini A, Segre A, Polgreen P . The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e19467. PMC: 3087759. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467. View

2.
Colditz J, Chu K, Emery S, Larkin C, James A, Welling J . Toward Real-Time Infoveillance of Twitter Health Messages. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(8):1009-1014. PMC: 6050832. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304497. View

3.
Lowry M, Fouse D . Communicating Research in an Era of Misinformation. Am J Public Health. 2019; 109(5):645. PMC: 6459627. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305048. View

4.
Broniatowski D, Jamison A, Qi S, AlKulaib L, Chen T, Benton A . Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(10):1378-1384. PMC: 6137759. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567. View

5.
Albarracin D, Romer D, Jones C, Hall Jamieson K, Jamieson P . Misleading Claims About Tobacco Products in YouTube Videos: Experimental Effects of Misinformation on Unhealthy Attitudes. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(6):e229. PMC: 6045787. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9959. View