» Articles » PMID: 33991721

Universal Engraftment After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Cryopreserved CD34-Selected Grafts

Overview
Date 2021 May 15
PMID 33991721
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, most centers performing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have switched to the use of cryopreserved grafts. Previous investigators have suggested that cryopreserved allografts may heighten risk of nonengraftment. To date, no study has investigated the effect of cryopreservation of CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34 HPCs) used as the sole graft source. In this study, we sought to evaluate outcomes after unrelated donor or matched sibling allo-HCT with cryopreserved CD34 HPCs. This was a single-center analysis of adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allo-HCT with cryopreserved CD34-selected allo-HCT grafts between January 2010 and June 2017. All patients received ablative conditioning and antirejection prophylaxis with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. G-CSF-mobilized leukapheresis products underwent CD34 selection using the CliniMACS Reagent System. Cells were then cryopreserved in DMSO (final concentration 7.5%) to -90 °C using a controlled-rate freezing system before being transferred to vapor-phase liquid nitrogen storage. In internal validation, this method has shown 92% mean CD34 cell viability and 99.7% mean CD34 cell recovery. Engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days of an absolute neutrophil count of ≥0.5. Platelet recovery was recorded as the first of 7 consecutive days with a platelet count ≥20 K/μL without transfusion. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate rates of relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A total of 64 patients received a cryopreserved CD34-selected graft. The median CD34 cell count before cryopreservation was 6.6 × 10/kg (range, 1.4 to 16.1 × 10/kg), and the median CD3 cell count was 2.0 × 10/kg (range, 0 to 21.1 × 10/kg). All patients were engrafted, at a median of 11 days post-HCT (range, 8 to 14 days). One patient had poor graft function in the setting of cytomegalovirus viremia, necessitating a CD34-selected boost on day +57. The median time to platelet recovery was 16 days (range, 13 to 99 days). The estimated 2-year OS was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58% to 83%) with cryopreserved grafts versus 62% (95% CI, 57% to 67%) with fresh grafts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.35; P = .5). The estimated 2-year RFS in the 2 groups was 59% (95% CI, 48% to 74%) versus 56% (95% CI, 51% to 61%; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.51; P > .9). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 29% (95% CI, 17% to 41%) versus 23% (95% CI, 19% to 27%; P = .16), and the cumulative incidence of NRM at 2 years was 17% (95% CI, 9% to 28%) versus 23% (95% CI, 19% to 28%; P = .24). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100 was 16% with cryopreserved grafts (95% CI, 8% to 26%) and 16% (95% CI, 13% to 20%; P = .97) with fresh grafts. Moderate to severe chronic GVHD by day +365 occurred in only 1 recipient of a cryopreserved graft (2%). Our data show that in patients with hematologic malignancies who received cryopreserved allogeneic CD34 HPCs, engraftment, GVHD, and survival outcomes were consistent with those seen in recipients of fresh allogeneic CD34 HPC grafts at our center. Our laboratory validation and clinical experience demonstrate the safety of our cryopreservation procedure for CD34-selected allografts.

Citing Articles

Pattern of Immune Reconstitution Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Data From a Resource Constraint Country.

Rahim U, Iftikhar R, Ghafoor T, Khan H, Siddiq A, Tariq H Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67566.

PMID: 39310495 PMC: 11416716. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67566.


Secondary Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic on Patients and the Cellular Therapy Healthcare Ecosystem.

Koo J, Auletta J, Hartley D, Huber J, Jaglowski S, Kapadia M Transplant Cell Ther. 2022; 28(11):737-746.

PMID: 35902050 PMC: 9313529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.020.


Impact of Cryopreservation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) in Transplantation from Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD).

Facchin G, Savignano C, Battista M, Isola M, De Martino M, Petruzzellis G J Clin Med. 2022; 11(14).

PMID: 35887878 PMC: 9320435. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144114.

References
1.
Huang Y, Kim S, Lee Y, Burack D, Nichols P, Maloy M . Co-Infections by Double-Stranded DNA Viruses after Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted, CD34 Selected Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017; 23(10):1759-1766. PMC: 5633047. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.06.008. View

2.
Fisher V, Khuu H, David-Ocampo V, Byrne K, Pavletic S, Bishop M . Analysis of the recovery of cryopreserved and thawed CD34+ and CD3+ cells collected for hematopoietic transplantation. Transfusion. 2013; 54(4):1088-92. PMC: 3983171. DOI: 10.1111/trf.12428. View

3.
Sutherland D, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I . The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother. 1996; 5(3):213-26. DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.213. View

4.
Papadopoulos E, Carabasi M, Castro-Malaspina H, Childs B, Mackinnon S, Boulad F . T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as postremission therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: freedom from relapse in the absence of graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 1998; 91(3):1083-90. View

5.
Purtill D, Antonenas V, Chiappini P, Tong D, OFlaherty E, Bajel A . Variable CD34+ recovery of cryopreserved allogeneic HPC products: transplant implications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Blood Adv. 2020; 4(17):4147-4150. PMC: 7479963. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002431. View