» Articles » PMID: 33991326

Pharmacokinetics and Comparative Bioavailability of Apomorphine Sublingual Film and Subcutaneous Apomorphine Formulations in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and "OFF" Episodes: Results of a Randomized, Three-Way Crossover, Open-Label Study

Overview
Journal Neurol Ther
Publisher Springer
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 May 15
PMID 33991326
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In a pivotal study, apomorphine sublingual film (APL; KYNMOBI) was an effective and generally well-tolerated on-demand treatment of "OFF" episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), approved across the dose range of 10-30 mg. Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of APL and two subcutaneous (SC) apomorphine formulations (SC-APO [APOKYN] and SC-APO-GO [APO-go PEN]) were evaluated in a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study (NCT03292016).

Methods: Patients with PD and "OFF" episodes received an open-label randomized sequence of single doses of SC-APO and SC-APO-GO at the currently prescribed dose (2/3/4/5 mg) and APL doses with similar plasma exposure (15/20/25/30 mg) with ≥ 1-day washout between formulations. Plasma pharmacokinetics of apomorphine and apomorphine sulfate (major inactive metabolite) were measured 0-6 h postdose.

Results: Median time to maximum plasma concentration (t) of apomorphine was 0.63-0.75 h for APL and 0.25-0.38 h for SC-APO and SC-APO-GO. Geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (C) of apomorphine was 4.31-11.2 ng/ml across APL doses and was generally lower compared with SC apomorphine formulations within dose groups. Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC) was similar across apomorphine formulations within most dose groups. Relative bioavailability of APL was ~ 17% of SC apomorphine by AUC; SC-APO and SC-APO-GO had similar bioavailability (98% and 83% by AUC and C, respectively). Apomorphine sulfate exposure was ~ three-fold higher for APL versus SC-APO and SC-APO-GO by AUC and C.

Conclusion: In patients with PD and "OFF" episodes, APL demonstrated lower C and relative bioavailability but similar exposures (AUCs) versus SC apomorphine within the approved dose range.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03292016.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic drug monitoring in Parkinson's disease.

Muller T, Gerlach M, Hefner G, Hiemke C, Jost W, Riederer P J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024; 131(10):1247-1262.

PMID: 39227478 PMC: 11489222. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02828-5.


Clinical trial evaluating apomorphine oromucosal solution in Parkinson's disease patients.

Thijssen E, Tuk B, Cakici M, van Velze V, Klaassen E, Merkus F Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(5):e13796.

PMID: 38712716 PMC: 11075157. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13796.


Model-based comparison of subcutaneous versus sublingual apomorphine administration in the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.

Nasser A, Gomeni R, Ceresoli-Borroni G, Xie L, Busse G, Melyan Z J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2024; 51(4):385-393.

PMID: 38578533 PMC: 11254985. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-024-09914-x.


Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film in patients with Parkinson's disease complicated by OFF episodes: a phase 3, open-label study.

Kassubek J, Factor S, Balaguer E, Schwarz J, Chaudhuri K, Isaacson S J Neurol. 2024; 271(6):3554-3570.

PMID: 38546829 PMC: 11136727. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12323-2.


Natural aporphine alkaloids: A comprehensive review of phytochemistry, pharmacokinetics, anticancer activities, and clinical application.

Sun J, Zhan X, Wang W, Yang X, Liu Y, Yang H J Adv Res. 2023; 63:231-253.

PMID: 37935346 PMC: 11380034. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.11.003.