» Articles » PMID: 33990647

A Numerical Study on Capillary-evaporation Behavior of Porous Wick in Electronic Cigarettes

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 15
PMID 33990647
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A mathematical model based on heat and mass transfer processes in the porous wick of electronic cigarettes was established to describe the atomization of e-liquids according to max liquid temperature, vaporization rate and thermal efficiency in a single puff. Dominant capillary-evaporation effects were defined in the model to account for the effects of electrical power, e-liquid composition and porosity of the wick material on atomization and energy transmission processes. Liquid temperature, vaporization rate, and thermal efficiency were predicted using the mathematical model in 64 groups, varying with electrical power, e-liquid composition and wick porosity. Experimental studies were carried out using a scaled-model test bench to validate the model's prediction. A higher PG/VG ratio in the e-liquid promoted energy transfer for vaporization, and the e-liquid temperature was comparatively reduced at a relatively high power, which was helpful to avoid atomizer overheating. Compared with the other factors, wick porosity affected the thermal efficiency more significantly. The vaporization rate increased with a higher wick porosity in a certain range. The modelling results suggested that a greater wick porosity and a higher PG ratio in e-liquids helped to improve the overall thermal efficiency.

Citing Articles

The effects of flavored vaped e-liquids on cultured human macrophages derived from the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Bradley C, Walker-Franklin I, Kovach A, Sivaraman V, Onyenwoke R Toxicol In Vitro. 2025; 104:106013.

PMID: 39894183 PMC: 11845287. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106013.

References
1.
Brown C, Cheng J . Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations. Tob Control. 2014; 23 Suppl 2:ii4-10. PMC: 3995271. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051476. View

2.
Baassiri M, Talih S, Salman R, Karaoghlanian N, Saleh R, El Hage R . Clouds and "throat hit": Effects of liquid composition on nicotine emissions and physical characteristics of electronic cigarette aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020; 51(11):1231-1239. PMC: 7453347. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1341040. View

3.
Uchiyama S, Ohta K, Inaba Y, Kunugita N . Determination of carbonyl compounds generated from the E-cigarette using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Sci. 2013; 29(12):1219-22. DOI: 10.2116/analsci.29.1219. View

4.
Cressey D . Regulation stacks up for e-cigarettes. Nature. 2013; 501(7468):473. DOI: 10.1038/501473a. View

5.
Breland A, Spindle T, Weaver M, Eissenberg T . Science and electronic cigarettes: current data, future needs. J Addict Med. 2014; 8(4):223-33. PMC: 4122311. DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000049. View