» Articles » PMID: 33987520

Youth and Parent Perceptions on Participating in Specialized Multidisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Options: A Qualitative Timeline Effect Analysis

Overview
Journal Can J Pain
Date 2021 May 14
PMID 33987520
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Little is known about how the specialized treatment journey is perceived by youth with pain-related disability and their parents. : Describe and compare the treatment effects and outcomes as perceived by youth and their parents enrolled in intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) or multimodal treatment (MMT). : Eleven IIPT youth and five parents and three MMT youth and five parents were recruited. All were asked to complete a treatment journey timeline, followed by separately conducted semistructured interviews. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. : The main themes spanned the treatment trajectory. All participants described similar initial struggles (Theme 1). Positive and negative treatment effects associated with acquisitions and disruptions (Theme 2), and outcomes post-discharge related to supports and realities (Theme 3) emerged. Knowledge, skills, and support acquisition during treatment and feeling empowered and confident to self-manage postdischarge were identified as IIPT benefits. However, the change effort and life disruptions required and the difficulty transitioning to real life postprogram were acknowledged as detrimental IIPT impacts. Continuing with life as usual and maintaining supports in daily contexts (e.g., school personnel, friends) were reported MMT benefits. However, the challenges of managing pain, treatment adherence within the competing demands of daily realities, and the lack of support to integrate strategies were emphasized as detrimental MMT impacts. : Detailed impacts of two specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation interventions on the lives of youth with pain-related disability and their parents are described. The treatments benefits and previously unexplored detrimental effects are unveiled.

Citing Articles

A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments.

France E, Uny I, Turley R, Thomson K, Noyes J, Jordan A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 10:CD014873.

PMID: 37795766 PMC: 10552070. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014873.pub2.


Participant-Generated Timelines: A Participatory Tool to Explore Young People With Chronic Pain and Parents' Narratives of Their Healthcare Experiences.

Hurtubise K, Joslin R Qual Health Res. 2023; 33(11):931-944.

PMID: 37539703 PMC: 10494482. DOI: 10.1177/10497323231189388.


Baseline Factors Associated with Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Interference in Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment for Youth.

Long R, Walker A, Pan S, Miller J, Rayner L, Vallely J Children (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508726 PMC: 10378082. DOI: 10.3390/children10071229.


A memory-reframing intervention to reduce pain in youth undergoing major surgery: Pilot randomized controlled trial of feasibility and acceptability.

Pavlova M, Lund T, Sun J, Katz J, Brindle M, Noel M Can J Pain. 2022; 6(2):152-165.

PMID: 35711298 PMC: 9196744. DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2058919.


Exploring the Outcomes That Matter Most to Young People Treated for Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Study.

Joslin R, Donovan-Hall M, Roberts L Children (Basel). 2021; 8(12).

PMID: 34943368 PMC: 8700210. DOI: 10.3390/children8121170.

References
1.
Brousselle A, Champagne F . Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2010; 34(1):69-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001. View

2.
Banez G, Frazier T, Wojtowicz A, Buchannan K, Henry D, Benore E . Chronic pain in children and adolescents: 24-42 month outcomes of an inpatient/day hospital interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2014; 7(3):197-206. DOI: 10.3233/PRM-140289. View

3.
Sibeoni J, Chambon L, Pommepuy N, Rappaport C, Revah-Levy A . Psychiatric care of children with autism spectrum disorder - What do their siblings think about it? A qualitative study. Autism. 2017; 23(2):326-337. DOI: 10.1177/1362361317728435. View

4.
Lamontagne M, Swaine B, Lavoie A, Champagne F, Marcotte A . Consensus group sessions: a useful method to reconcile stakeholders' perspectives about network performance evaluation. Int J Integr Care. 2011; 10:e117. PMC: 3031851. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.537. View

5.
Hechler T, Kanstrup M, Holley A, Simons L, Wicksell R, Hirschfeld G . Systematic Review on Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment of Children With Chronic Pain. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(1):115-27. PMC: 9923588. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3319. View