Prosthodontics Using Removable Platform Switching Technologies (Multiunit, On1) As Exemplified by Conical Connection Implant Systems for Early and Immediate Loading

Overview

Journal Int J Dent

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2021 May 14

PMID 33986808

Citations 1

Authors

Roman Studenikin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The removable platform switching technology (multiunit, Оn1) was tested intraoperatively using the passive placement technique as exemplified by a conical connection implant system, which makes it possible to visually control the placement of these platforms with respect to the alveolar bone in the correct orthopedic position. The technology is characterized by a rapid epithelialization of tissues around the base platform until the final integration of the implant, minimal trauma in the emergence profile zone, and an improved minimally invasive orthopedic protocol for working on a removable platform switching base.

Citing Articles

Influence of a new abutment design concept on the biomechanics of peri-implant bone, implant components, and microgap formation: a finite element analysis.

Nie H, Tang Y, Yang Y, Wu W, Zhou W, Liu Z BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):277.

PMID: 37170117 PMC: 10176806. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02989-x.

References

Jeon J, Kim D, Lee J, Kim J, Kim W . Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8(3):214-8. PMC: 4919492. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.214. View

Utyuzh A, Valerievich Yumashev A, Lang H, Zekiy A, Lushkov R . Comprehensive Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Osteosarcoma of the Mandible. Implant Dent. 2018; 27(3):332-341. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000756. View

Weigl P, Strangio A . The impact of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants on hard and soft tissues in the anterior maxilla. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016; 9 Suppl 1:S89-106. View

Saleh M, Ravida A, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Lin G, Asaad F, Wang H . The effect of implant-abutment junction position on crestal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20(4):617-633. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12600. View

da Cunha L, Prochnow R, Costacurta A, Gonzaga C, Correr G . Replacement of Anterior Composite Resin Restorations Using Conservative Ceramics for Occlusal and Periodontal Rehabilitation: An 18-Month Clinical Follow-Up. Case Rep Dent. 2016; 2016:9728593. PMC: 4983345. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9728593. View

Mehl C, Gassling V, Schultz-Langerhans S, Acil Y, Bahr T, Wiltfang J . Influence of Four Different Abutment Materials and the Adhesive Joint of Two-Piece Abutments on Cervical Implant Bone and Soft Tissue. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31(6):1264-1272. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5321. View

Sanz-Sanchez I, Sanz-Martin I, Carrillo de Albornoz A, Figuero E, Sanz M . Biological effect of the abutment material on the stability of peri-implant marginal bone levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 18:124-144. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13293. View

Harmon M, Ramos D, Nithyadevi D, Bordett R, Rudraiah S, Nukavarapu S . Growing a backbone - functional biomaterials and structures for intervertebral disc (IVD) repair and regeneration: challenges, innovations, and future directions. Biomater Sci. 2020; 8(5):1216-1239. DOI: 10.1039/c9bm01288e. View

Liu J, Chen H, DoDo H, Yousef H, Firestone A, Chaudhry J . Efficacy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Evaluating Bone Quality for Optimum Implant Treatment Planning. Implant Dent. 2017; 26(3):405-411. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000542. View

10.

Tai B, Kao Y, Payne N, Zheng Y, Chen L, Shih A . 3D Printed composite for simulating thermal and mechanical responses of the cortical bone in orthopaedic surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2018; 61:61-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.08.004. View

11.

Bramanti E, Norcia A, Cicciu M, Matacena G, Cervino G, Troiano G . Postextraction Dental Implant in the Aesthetic Zone, Socket Shield Technique Versus Conventional Protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29(4):1037-1041. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004419. View

12.

Araujo M, Lindhe J . Peri-implant health. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S249-S256. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.16-0424. View

13.

Fiorillo L, Cicciu M, DAmico C, Mauceri R, Oteri G, Cervino G . Finite Element Method and Von Mises Investigation on Bone Response to Dynamic Stress with a Novel Conical Dental Implant Connection. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:2976067. PMC: 7568164. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2976067. View

14.

Sotto-Maior B, Lima C, Senna P, de Villa Camargos G, Del Bel Cury A . Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal dental implants with different bone anchorages. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0023.. View

15.

Kang D, Kim S, Choi Y, Kim Y . Repeated failure of implants at the same site: a retrospective clinical study. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 41(1):27. PMC: 6616583. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-019-0209-1. View

16.

Aimetti M, Ferrarotti F, Mariani G, Ghelardoni C, Romano F . Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30(6):1369-77. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4017. View

17.

Lang N . Oral Implants: The Paradigm Shift in Restorative Dentistry. J Dent Res. 2019; 98(12):1287-1293. DOI: 10.1177/0022034519853574. View

18.

Wang X, Li Y, Feng Y, Cheng H, Li D . Macrophage polarization in aseptic bone resorption around dental implants induced by Ti particles in a murine model. J Periodontal Res. 2019; 54(4):329-338. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12633. View