» Articles » PMID: 33986066

Developing a Theory-informed Complex Intervention to Improve Nurse-patient Therapeutic Engagement Employing Experience-based Co-design and the Behaviour Change Wheel: an Acute Mental Health Ward Case Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 May 14
PMID 33986066
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Our objectives were threefold: (1) describe a collaborative, theoretically driven approach to co-designing complex interventions; (2) demonstrate the implementation of this approach to share learning with others; and (3) develop a toolkit to enhance therapeutic engagement on acute mental health wards.

Design And Participants: We describe a theory-driven approach to co-designing an intervention by adapting and integrating Experience-based Co-design (EBCD) with the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Our case study was informed by the results of a systematic integrative review and guided by this integrated approach. We undertook 80 hours of non-participant observations, and semistructured interviews with 14 service users (7 of which were filmed), 2 carers and 12 clinicians from the same acute ward. The facilitated intervention co-design process involved two feedback workshops, one joint co-design workshop and seven small co-design team meetings. Data analysis comprised the identification of touchpoints and use of the BCW and behaviour change technique taxonomy to inform intervention development.

Setting: This study was conducted over 12 months at an acute mental health organisation in England.

Results: The co-designed toolkit addressed four joint service user/clinician priorities for change: (1) improve communication with withdrawn people; (2) nurses to help service users help themselves; (3) nurses to feel confident when engaging with service users; (4) improving team relations and ward culture. Intervention functions included training, education, enablement, coercion and persuasion; 14 behaviour change techniques supported these functions. We detail how we implemented our integrated co-design-behaviour change approach with service users, carers and clinicians to develop a toolkit to improve nurse-patient therapeutic engagement.

Conclusions: Our theory-driven approach enhanced both EBCD and the BCW. It introduces a robust theoretical approach to guide intervention development within the co-design process and sets out how to meaningfully involve service users and other stakeholders when designing and implementing complex interventions.

Citing Articles

Learning from the community: iterative co-production of a programme to support the development of attention, regulation and thinking skills in toddlers at elevated likelihood of autism or ADHD.

Hendry A, Hulks V, Murphy S, Radford H, Smith S, Charman T Res Involv Engagem. 2025; 11(1):7.

PMID: 39856726 PMC: 11762902. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-025-00674-7.


Improving the Use of Sensory Approaches in an Acute Inpatient Mental Health Unit Using a Co-Designed Multifaceted Implementation Strategy.

Wright L, Meredith P, Bennett S, Doig E Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024; 34(1):e13438.

PMID: 39370529 PMC: 11751764. DOI: 10.1111/inm.13438.


Enhancing care in the initiation and management of insulin in older people with diabetes: A collaborative journey with older individuals and their caregivers using Experience-Based Co-Design.

Langerman C, Forbes A, Robert G PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0302516.

PMID: 39074147 PMC: 11285973. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302516.


Understanding organisational and nursing behaviour changes associated with a therapeutic engagement improvement tool in acute mental health inpatient settings: A qualitative analysis.

Taylor F, Galloway S, Irons K, Mess L, Pemberton L, Worton K Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 6:100180.

PMID: 38746798 PMC: 11080536. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100180.


Developing a Suite of Resources to Improve Patient Adherence to Compression Stockings: Application of Behavior Change Theory.

Bar L, Marks D, Brandis S Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17:51-66.

PMID: 36636284 PMC: 9831124. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S390123.


References
1.
Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, Purushotham A, Sturmey G, Gager M . Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ. 2015; 350:g7714. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7714. View

2.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

3.
Swanson K . Predicting depressive symptoms after miscarriage: a path analysis based on the Lazarus paradigm. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000; 9(2):191-206. DOI: 10.1089/152460900318696. View

4.
Nolan F, Fox C, Cheston R, Turner D, Clark A, Dodd E . A feasibility study comparing UK older adult mental health inpatient wards which use protected engagement time with other wards which do not: study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2:7. PMC: 5153860. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0049-z. View

5.
Cutcliffe J, Santos J, Kozel B, Taylor P, Lees D . Raiders of the Lost Art: A review of published evaluations of inpatient mental health care experiences emanating from the United Kingdom, Portugal, Canada, Switzerland, Germany and Australia. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015; 24(5):375-85. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12159. View