» Articles » PMID: 33982019

Citizen Science As a Data-based Practice: A Consideration of Data Justice

Overview
Journal Patterns (N Y)
Date 2021 May 13
PMID 33982019
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Citizen science has been motivated by several perspectives, including increased efficiency in data collection and distributed analysis, democratizing knowledge production, making science more responsive to community needs, and improving the representation of marginalized populations in public data. Despite the potential of citizen science to achieve social justice agendas through a data-intensive and data-driven participatory scientific enquiry, scholarship in critical data studies offers several problematizations of data-based practices, highlighting risks of exclusion and inequality. To understand the extent to which citizen science supports and challenges forms of injustice, this study used a "data justice" analytical framework to critically explore the assemblages of citizen science. We examined four citizen science cases with different levels of citizen engagement, intended outcomes, and data systems. The analysis suggests instances of injustice occurring throughout the data processes of the citizen science cases across the dimensions of procedural, instrumental, rights-based, structural, and distributive data justice.

Citing Articles

How Do Age and Attitudes Affect the Quality of Data Collected by Young Citizen Scientists in an Ecological Research Project?.

Aivelo T Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70428.

PMID: 39398631 PMC: 11467035. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70428.


Conservation ethics in the time of the pandemic: Does increasing remote access advance social justice?.

Miller-Rushing A, Ellwood E, Crimmins T, Gallinat A, Phillips M, Sandler R Biol Conserv. 2022; 276:109788.

PMID: 36408461 PMC: 9643013. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109788.


Evaluating the use of semi-structured crowdsourced data to quantify inequitable access to urban biodiversity: A case study with eBird.

Grade A, Chan N, Gajbhiye P, Perkins D, Warren P PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277223.

PMID: 36350898 PMC: 9645630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277223.


User-Centred Design of a Final Results Report for Participants in Multi-Sensor Personal Air Pollution Exposure Monitoring Campaigns.

Robinson J, Novak R, Kanduc T, Maggos T, Pardali D, Stamatelopoulou A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(23).

PMID: 34886269 PMC: 8656880. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312544.

References
1.
Greshake Tzovaras B, Angrist M, Arvai K, Dulaney M, Estrada-Galinanes V, Gunderson B . Open Humans: A platform for participant-centered research and personal data exploration. Gigascience. 2019; 8(6). PMC: 6593360. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz076. View

2.
Baum F, Macdougall C, Smith D . Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(10):854-7. PMC: 2566051. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2004.028662. View

3.
Conrad C, Hilchey K . A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ Monit Assess. 2010; 176(1-4):273-91. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5. View

4.
Gaber N . Mobilizing Health Metrics for the Human Right to Water in Flint and Detroit, Michigan. Health Hum Rights. 2019; 21(1):179-189. PMC: 6586960. View

5.
Evans B . Power to the People: Data Citizens in the Age of Precision Medicine. Vanderbilt J Entertain Technol Law. 2017; 19(2):243-265. PMC: 5673282. View