» Articles » PMID: 33981356

Advancing Transparency and Openness in Child Development Research: Opportunities

Overview
Date 2021 May 13
PMID 33981356
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transparency and openness are basic scientific values. They lie at the heart of practices that accelerate discovery and broaden access to scientific knowledge. In this article, we argue that these values are essential to ensure the enduring influence of research on child development. They are also critical for the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD) to accomplish its mission to benefit diverse global stakeholders and constituents. A companion article in this issue (Gilmore, Cole, Verma, van Aken, Worthman) discusses the challenges in realizing SRCD's vision for a science of child development that is open, transparent, robust, impactful, and conducted with the highest integrity. Here, we discuss opportunities for the society to set standards that ensure the full integration of transparency and openness into developmental science.

Citing Articles

Open Developmental Science: An Overview and Annotated Reading List.

Kalandadze T, Hart S Infant Child Dev. 2024; 33(1).

PMID: 39308897 PMC: 11415275. DOI: 10.1002/icd.2334.


Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.

Petersen I, Apfelbaum K, McMurray B Infant Child Dev. 2024; 33(1).

PMID: 38425545 PMC: 10904029. DOI: 10.1002/icd.2315.


The mountain stream of infant development.

Tamis-LeMonda C Infancy. 2023; 28(3):468-491.

PMID: 36961322 PMC: 10184132. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12538.


How can we optimise learning from trials in child and adolescent mental health?.

Axford N, Berry V, Lloyd J, Wyatt K Evid Based Ment Health. 2022; .

PMID: 35820994 PMC: 10231499. DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300500.


Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.

Grant S, Wendt K, Leadbeater B, Supplee L, Mayo-Wilson E, Gardner F Prev Sci. 2022; 23(5):701-722.

PMID: 35175501 PMC: 9283153. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01336-w.


References
1.
Gilbert D, King G, Pettigrew S, Wilson T . Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 2016; 351(6277):1037. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad7243. View

2.
Gilmore R, Adolph K, Millman D, Gordon A . Transforming Education Research Through Open Video Data Sharing. Adv Eng Educ. 2017; 5(2). PMC: 5199018. View

3.
Button K, Ioannidis J, Mokrysz C, Nosek B, Flint J, Robinson E . Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14(5):365-76. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3475. View

4.
Hardwicke T, Mathur M, MacDonald K, Nilsonne G, Banks G, Kidwell M . Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal . R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(8):180448. PMC: 6124055. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180448. View

5.
Camerer C, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho T, Huber J, Johannesson M . Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 2(9):637-644. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. View