» Articles » PMID: 33980941

Validity of Different Copeptin Assays in the Differential Diagnosis of the Polyuria-polydipsia Syndrome

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 13
PMID 33980941
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to correlate three commercially available copeptin assays and their diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. Analyzed data include repeated copeptin measures of 8 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome undergoing osmotic stimulation and of 40 patients hospitalized with pneumonia. Copeptin was measured using the automated Brahms KRYPTOR, the manual Brahms LIA and the manual Cloud Clone ELISA assay. Primary outcome was the interrater correlation coefficient (ICC) and diagnostic accuracy in the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome of the three assays. In healthy volunteers, there was a moderate correlation for the KRYPTOR and LIA (ICC 0.74; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.91), and a poor correlation for the KRYPTOR and ELISA (ICC 0.07; 95% CI - 0.06 to 0.29), as for the LIA and ELISA (ICC 0.04; 95% CI - 0.04 to 0.17). The KRYPTOR had the highest diagnostic accuracy (98% (95% CI 83 to100)), comparable to the LIA (88% (95% CI 74 to 100)), while the ELISA had a poor diagnostic accuracy (55% (95% CI 34 to 68)) in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. The KRYPTOR and LIA yield comparable copeptin concentrations and high diagnostic accuracy, while the ELISA correlates poorly with the other two assays and shows a poor diagnostic accuracy for polyuria-polydipsia patients. The current copeptin cut-off is valid for the KRYPTOR and LIA assay. Our results indicate that interpretation with other assays should be performed with caution and separate validation studies are required before their use in differentiating patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome.Trial registration: NCT02647736 January 6, 2016/NCT01940614 September 12, 2013/NCT00973154 September 9, 2009.

Citing Articles

Orally administered prednisolone decreases plasma arginine vasopressin and serum copeptin concentrations in healthy dogs.

Paulin M, Mehrabanpour D, Unniappan S, Snead E J Vet Intern Med. 2025; 39(1):e17304.

PMID: 39831546 PMC: 11744477. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17304.


Approach to the Patient With Suspected Hypotonic Polyuria.

Newell-Price J, Drummond J, Gurnell M, Levy M, McCormack A, Cooper D J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 110(2):e506-e514.

PMID: 39148427 PMC: 11747752. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae565.


The value of using ELISA to detect orexin-A in cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of narcolepsy.

Zhan Q, Deng L, Ding Y, Wang F, Han F, Zhou B Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(24):e38539.

PMID: 38875396 PMC: 11175925. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038539.


Arginine vasopressin deficiency: diagnosis, management and the relevance of oxytocin deficiency.

Atila C, Refardt J, Christ-Crain M Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024; 20(8):487-500.

PMID: 38693275 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-024-00985-x.


Cancer and the Vasopressin Gene: Radioimmunoassay Values and Commentary on Copeptin as a Plasma Marker.

North W Onco Targets Ther. 2023; 16:973-982.

PMID: 38021449 PMC: 10674625. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S425723.


References
1.
Pool A, Wang T, Stafford D, Chance R, Lee S, Ngai J . The cellular basis of distinct thirst modalities. Nature. 2020; 588(7836):112-117. PMC: 7718410. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2821-8. View

2.
Wannamethee S, Welsh P, Papacosta O, Lennon L, Whincup P, Sattar N . Copeptin, Insulin Resistance, and Risk of Incident Diabetes in Older Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100(9):3332-9. PMC: 4570154. DOI: 10.1210/JC.2015-2362. View

3.
Dong X, Huang M, Yang S, Yu W, Zhang Z . Copeptin is associated with mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2011; 71(5):1194-8. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821283f2. View

4.
Enhorning S, Brunkwall L, Tasevska I, Ericson U, Persson Tholin J, Persson M . Water Supplementation Reduces Copeptin and Plasma Glucose in Adults With High Copeptin: The H2O Metabolism Pilot Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 104(6):1917-1925. PMC: 6541888. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-02195. View

5.
Lin Y, Liu K, Wang C, Li L, Liu Y . Electrochemical immunosensor for detection of epidermal growth factor reaching lower detection limit: toward oxidized glutathione as a more efficient blocking reagent for the antibody functionalized silver nanoparticles and antigen interaction. Anal Chem. 2015; 87(16):8047-51. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01834. View