» Articles » PMID: 33980933

Novel Vocalizations Are Understood Across Cultures

Abstract

Linguistic communication requires speakers to mutually agree on the meanings of words, but how does such a system first get off the ground? One solution is to rely on iconic gestures: visual signs whose form directly resembles or otherwise cues their meaning without any previously established correspondence. However, it is debated whether vocalizations could have played a similar role. We report the first extensive cross-cultural study investigating whether people from diverse linguistic backgrounds can understand novel vocalizations for a range of meanings. In two comprehension experiments, we tested whether vocalizations produced by English speakers could be understood by listeners from 28 languages from 12 language families. Listeners from each language were more accurate than chance at guessing the intended referent of the vocalizations for each of the meanings tested. Our findings challenge the often-cited idea that vocalizations have limited potential for iconic representation, demonstrating that in the absence of words people can use vocalizations to communicate a variety of meanings.

Citing Articles

Universal interpretations of vocal music.

Yurdum L, Singh M, Glowacki L, Vardy T, Atkinson Q, Hilton C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(37):e2218593120.

PMID: 37676911 PMC: 10500275. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2218593120.


A cross-linguistic, sound symbolic relationship between labial consonants, voiced plosives, and Pokémon friendship.

Kilpatrick A, Cwiek A, Lewis E, Kawahara S Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1113143.

PMID: 36910799 PMC: 10000297. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113143.


Deep learning reveals what vocal bursts express in different cultures.

Brooks J, Tzirakis P, Baird A, Kim L, Opara M, Fang X Nat Hum Behav. 2022; 7(2):240-250.

PMID: 36577898 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01489-2.


What's in a Japanese 'cute' name? A linguistic perspective.

Kumagai G Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1040415.

PMID: 36438396 PMC: 9683379. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1040415.


Optionality in animal communication: a novel framework for examining the evolution of arbitrariness.

Watson S, Filippi P, Gasparri L, Falk N, Tamer N, Widmer P Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022; 97(6):2057-2075.

PMID: 35818133 PMC: 9795909. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12882.


References
1.
Perniss P, Thompson R, Vigliocco G . Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:227. PMC: 3153832. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227. View

2.
Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33(2-3):61-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. View

3.
Kendon A . Reflections on the "gesture-first" hypothesis of language origins. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 24(1):163-170. PMC: 5325861. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1117-3. View

4.
Arbib M, Liebal K, Pika S . Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language. Curr Anthropol. 2009; 49(6):1053-63. DOI: 10.1086/593015. View

5.
Pollick A, de Waal F . Ape gestures and language evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(19):8184-9. PMC: 1876592. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702624104. View