» Articles » PMID: 33975858

The Time Varying Networks of the Interoceptive Attention and Rest

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 May 12
PMID 33975858
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Focused attention to spontaneous sensations is a dynamic process that demands interoceptive abilities. Failure to control it has been linked to neuropsychiatric disorders like illness-anxiety disorder. Regulatory strategies, such as focused attention meditation (FAM), may enhance the ability to control focused attention particularly to body sensations, which can be reflected on functional neuroanatomy. The functional connectivity (FC) related to focused attention has been described, however, the dynamic brain organization associated to this process and the differences to the resting state remains to be studied. To quantify the cerebral dynamic counterpart of focused attention to interoception, we examined fifteen experienced meditators while performing a 20-min attentional task to spontaneous sensations. Subjects underwent three scanning sessions obtaining a resting-state scan before and after the task. Sliding window dynamic FC (DFC) and k-means clustering identified five recurrent FC patterns along the dorsal attention network (DAN), default mode network (DMN), and frontoparietal network (FPN). Subjects remained longer in a low connectivity brain pattern during the resting conditions. By contrast, subjects spent a higher proportion of time in complex patterns during the task than rest. Moreover, a carry-over effect in FC was observed following the interoceptive task performance, suggestive of an active role in the learning process linked to cognitive training. Our results suggest that focused attention to interoceptive processes, demands a dynamic brain organization with specific features that distinguishes it from the resting condition. This approach may provide new insights characterizing the neural basis of the focused attention, an essential component for human adaptability.

Citing Articles

Inducing a meditative state by artificial perturbations: A mechanistic understanding of brain dynamics underlying meditation.

Dagnino P, Galadi J, Camara E, Deco G, Escrichs A Netw Neurosci. 2024; 8(2):517-540.

PMID: 38952817 PMC: 11168722. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00366.


Beyond the veil of duality-topographic reorganization model of meditation.

Cooper A, Ventura B, Northoff G Neurosci Conscious. 2022; 2022(1):niac013.

PMID: 36237370 PMC: 9552929. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niac013.

References
1.
Tang Y, Posner M . Attention training and attention state training. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(5):222-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.009. View

2.
Bauer C, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Diaz J, Pasaye E, Barrios F . From State-to-Trait Meditation: Reconfiguration of Central Executive and Default Mode Networks. eNeuro. 2019; 6(6). PMC: 6893234. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0335-18.2019. View

3.
Michael G, Naveteur J, Dupuy M, Jacquot L . My heart is in my hands: the interoceptive nature of the spontaneous sensations felt on the hands. Physiol Behav. 2015; 143:113-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.030. View

4.
Vossel S, Geng J, Fink G . Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist. 2013; 20(2):150-9. PMC: 4107817. DOI: 10.1177/1073858413494269. View

5.
Ko L, Komarov O, Hairston W, Jung T, Lin C . Sustained Attention in Real Classroom Settings: An EEG Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:388. PMC: 5534477. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00388. View