» Articles » PMID: 33974788

Uptake of Hearing Aids and Hearing Assistive Technology in a Working Population: Longitudinal Analyses of The Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing

Overview
Journal Ear Hear
Date 2021 May 11
PMID 33974788
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify predictors of the 5-year uptake of hearing aids (HAs) and hearing assistive technology (HAT) in a sample of Dutch employees eligible for HAs and/or HAT. The potential predictors included demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, and living situation), education, hearing factors (ability to recognize speech in noise and self-reported hearing disability), distress, self-efficacy, and work-related factors (job demand, job control, and need for recovery).

Design: Five-year follow-up data of the Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing (NL-SH) collected until January 2019 were included. An online digit-triplet in noise test, the National Hearing Test (NHT), was used to assess speech-recognition-in-noise ability. In addition, online questionnaires on demographic, socioeconomic, self-reported hearing disability, health, and work-related characteristics were administered. Adults who worked over 12 hours per week, who had not yet taken up HAs or HAT, but who would be eligible for HAs/HAT based on their NHT score (insufficient or poor hearing ability), were included in the study. The 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT was defined as a dichotomous variable of self-reported HA/HAT use reported 5 years later. Generalized Estimating Equations analyses were performed to analyze the associations between potential predicting factors and the 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT, taking into account the repeated measurements of the predicting factors and the 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT.

Results: Data of 218 participants were included. The cumulative incidence of the 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT was 15 to 33%, of which 52 employees took up HAs and 11 employees took up HAT. Married participants had increased odds for 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT compared with unmarried participants (odds ratio [OR] = 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 4.35). Higher self-reported hearing disability (per one unit, scale range 0 to 74) was associated with increased odds for 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.07). Job demand showed a significant interaction with sex (p = 0.002), and therefore, stratified analyses were performed. In male participants, participants with higher job demand scores (per one unit, scale range 12 to 48) had increased odds for 5-year uptake of HAs/HAT (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.35). No difference was seen in females.

Conclusion: This study confirms that factors predicting the uptake of HAs/HAT in the general or older populations, including marital status and self-reported hearing disability, also extend to the working population. The identification of job demand as a predictor of the uptake of HAs/HAT (in males only) was a novel finding. It demonstrates the importance of considering work-related factors in aural rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Hearing Screening in Older Adults in Primary Care Clinics: How the Effects of Setting and Provider Encouragement Differ by Patient Sex and Race.

West J, Dubno J, Francis H, Smith S Ear Hear. 2024; 46(2):512-522.

PMID: 39477819 PMC: 11833793. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001604.


Ten-year association between change in speech-in-noise recognition and falls due to balance problems: a longitudinal cohort study.

Jansen L, van Wier M, Vernimmen F, Goderie T, van de Berg R, Lemke U BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):732.

PMID: 38454406 PMC: 10919036. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18187-5.


Cohort profile: Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing (NL-SH).

van Wier M, Jansen L, Goderie T, Stam M, Nachtegaal J, van Beek J BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e070180.

PMID: 37068904 PMC: 10111885. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070180.


Factors Influencing Hearing Help-Seeking and Hearing Aid Uptake in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade.

Knoetze M, Manchaiah V, Mothemela B, Swanepoel D Trends Hear. 2023; 27:23312165231157255.

PMID: 36798964 PMC: 9940236. DOI: 10.1177/23312165231157255.


A proposed artificial intelligence-based real-time speech-to-text to sign language translator for South African official languages for the COVID-19 era and beyond: In pursuit of solutions for the hearing impaired.

Madahana M, Khoza-Shangase K, Moroe N, Mayombo D, Nyandoro O, Ekoru J S Afr J Commun Disord. 2022; 69(2):e1-e11.

PMID: 36073078 PMC: 9452925. DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v69i2.915.

References
1.
Kramer S, Kapteyn T, Houtgast T . Occupational performance: comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work. Int J Audiol. 2006; 45(9):503-12. DOI: 10.1080/14992020600754583. View

2.
Knudsen L, Oberg M, Nielsen C, Naylor G, Kramer S . Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif. 2010; 14(3):127-54. PMC: 4111466. DOI: 10.1177/1084713810385712. View

3.
Robards J, Evandrou M, Falkingham J, Vlachantoni A . Marital status, health and mortality. Maturitas. 2012; 73(4):295-9. PMC: 3635122. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.007. View

4.
Gussenhoven A, Singh A, Goverts S, van Til M, Anema J, Kramer S . A process evaluation of implementing a vocational enablement protocol for employees with hearing difficulties in clinical practice. Int J Audiol. 2015; 54(8):507-17. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1009642. View

5.
Ruusuvuori J, Aaltonen T, Koskela I, Ranta J, Lonka E, Salmenlinna I . Studies on stigma regarding hearing impairment and hearing aid use among adults of working age: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019; 43(3):436-446. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1622798. View