» Articles » PMID: 33972834

Evaluating the Influence of Action- and Subject-specific Factors on Chimpanzee Action Copying

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 11
PMID 33972834
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to imitate has been deemed crucial for the emergence of human culture. Although non-human animals also possess culture, the acquisition mechanisms underlying behavioural variation between populations in other species is still under debate. It is especially controversial whether great apes can spontaneously imitate. Action- and subject-specific factors have been suggested to influence the likelihood of an action to be imitated. However, few studies have jointly tested these hypotheses. Just one study to date has reported spontaneous imitation in chimpanzees (Persson . 2017 , 19-29), although important methodological limitations were not accounted for. Here, we present a study in which we (i) replicate the above-mentioned study addressing their limitations in an observational study of human-chimpanzee imitation; and (ii) aim to test the influence of action- and subject-specific factors on action copying in chimpanzees by providing human demonstrations of multiple actions to chimpanzees of varying rearing background. To properly address our second aim, we conducted a preparatory power analysis using simulated data. Contrary to Persson .'s study, we found extremely low rates of spontaneous chimpanzee imitation and we did not find enough cases of action matching to be able to apply our planned model with sufficient statistical power. We discuss possible factors explaining the lack of observed action matching in our experiments compared with previous studies.

Citing Articles

A computational approach to selective attention in embodied approaches to cognitive archaeology.

Constant A, Di Paolo L, Guenin-Carlut A, M Martinez L, Criado-Boado F, Mueller J J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(219):20240508.

PMID: 39378981 PMC: 11461058. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0508.


Empirical challenges from the comparative and developmental literature to the Shared Intentionality Theory - a review of alternative data on recursive mind reading, prosociality, imitation and cumulative culture.

Sauciuc G, Persson T Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1157137.

PMID: 37901066 PMC: 10613111. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157137.


A cultural evolutionary theory that explains both gradual and punctuated change.

Vidiella B, Carrignon S, Bentley R, OBrien M, Valverde S J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(196):20220570.

PMID: 36382378 PMC: 9667142. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0570.

References
1.
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H . Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011; 65(1):47-55. PMC: 3015194. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5. View

2.
Persson T, Sauciuc G, Alenkaer Madsen E . Spontaneous cross-species imitation in interactions between chimpanzees and zoo visitors. Primates. 2017; 59(1):19-29. PMC: 5740201. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-017-0624-9. View

3.
Barr D . Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:328. PMC: 3672519. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328. View

4.
Amici F, Aureli F, Call J . Response facilitation in the four great apes: is there a role for empathy?. Primates. 2013; 55(1):113-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-013-0375-1. View

5.
Redshaw J . Re-analysis of data reveals no evidence for neonatal imitation in rhesus macaques. Biol Lett. 2019; 15(7):20190342. PMC: 6684980. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0342. View