» Articles » PMID: 33972647

Shoulder Strap Fixation of LUCAS-2 to Facilitate Continuous CPR During Non-supine (stair) Stretcher Transport of OHCAs Patients

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 May 11
PMID 33972647
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early recognition and rapid initiation of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are key to maximising chances of achieving successful return of spontaneous circulation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs), as well as improving patient outcomes both inside and outside hospital. Mechanical chest compression devices such as the LUCAS-2 have been developed to assist rescuers in providing consistent, high-quality compressions, even during transportation. However, providing uninterrupted and effective compressions with LUCAS-2 during transportation down stairwells and in tight spaces in a non-supine position is relatively impossible. In this study, we proposed adaptations to the LUCAS-2 to allow its use during transportation down stairwells and examined its effectiveness in providing high-quality CPR to simulated OHCA patients. 20 volunteer emergency medical technicians were randomised into 10 pairs, each undergoing 2 simulation runs per experimental arm (LUCAS-2 versus control) with a loaded Resusci Anne First Aid full body manikin weighing 60 kg. Quality of CPR compressions performed was measured using the CPRmeter placed on the sternum of the manikin. The respective times taken for each phase of the simulation protocol were recorded. Fisher's exact tests were used to analyse categorical variables and median test to analyse continuous variables. The LUCAS-2 group required a longer time (~ 35 s) to prepare the patient prior to transport (p < 0.0001) and arrive at the ambulance (p < 0.0001) compared to the control group. The CPR quality in terms of depth and rate for the overall resuscitation period did not differ significantly between the LUCAS-2 group and control group, though there was a reduction in both parameters when evaluating the device's automated compressions during transport. Nevertheless, the application of the LUCAS-2 device yielded a significantly higher chest compression fraction of 0.76 (p < 0.0001). Our novel adaptations to the LUCAS-2 device allow for uninterrupted compressions in patients being transported down stairwells, thus yielding better chest compression fractions for the overall resuscitation period. Whether potentially improved post-OHCA survival rates may be achieved requires confirmation in a real-world scenario study.

Citing Articles

Early prehospital mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation use for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study.

Liu Y, Chen L, Huang S, Hsu S, Hsu C, Sun J BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):198.

PMID: 39427139 PMC: 11491000. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01115-6.


Complication frequency of mechanical chest compression devices: A single-center, blinded study using retrospective data.

Tsuchida T, Kamiishi T, Usubuchi H, Semba A, Takahashi M, Mizugaki A Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100786.

PMID: 39386132 PMC: 11462066. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100786.


Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in "hostile" environments: Using automated compression devices to minimize the rescuers' danger.

Latsios G, Leopoulou M, Synetos A, Karanasos A, Papanikolaou A, Bounas P World J Cardiol. 2023; 15(2):45-55.

PMID: 36911750 PMC: 9993930. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i2.45.


What are ambulance crews' experiences of using a mechanical chest compression device for out-of-hospital resuscitation? A constructivist qualitative study utilising online focus groups.

Blair L, Duffy R Br Paramed J. 2022; 7(2):24-30.

PMID: 36451709 PMC: 9662154. DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.24.


Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Goh Z, Chen M, Cheng H, Hsu K, Seak C, Seak J J Pers Med. 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35743739 PMC: 9225656. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060954.


References
1.
Riva G, Ringh M, Jonsson M, Svensson L, Herlitz J, Claesson A . Survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest After Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation or Chest Compressions Only Before Arrival of Emergency Medical Services: Nationwide Study During Three Guideline Periods. Circulation. 2019; 139(23):2600-2609. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038179. View

2.
Gyory R, Buchle S, Rodgers D, Lubin J . The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study. West J Emerg Med. 2017; 18(3):437-445. PMC: 5391893. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.32575. View

3.
Zuercher M, Ewy G . Gasping during cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009; 15(3):185-8. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283298e00. View

4.
Wik L, Olsen J, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano Jr M, Brouwer M . Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(6):741-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.005. View

5.
Morrison L, Angelini M, Vermeulen M, Schwartz B . Measuring the EMS patient access time interval and the impact of responding to high-rise buildings. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9(1):14-8. DOI: 10.1080/10903120590891679. View