» Articles » PMID: 33971500

How People Experience and Respond to Their Distress Predicts Problem Drinking More Than Does the Amount of Distress

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2021 May 10
PMID 33971500
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although broad dispositional negative affect predicts problematic alcohol use, emerging evidence suggests that individual differences in how people experience and respond to negative affect may play an important role in risk. In a sample of 358 college students assessed twice across their first year of college, the current study investigated the predictive roles of trait negative affect, affective lability (the tendency to experience rapid and intense shifts in mood), negative urgency (the tendency to act rashly when highly emotional), and problem drinking via self-report measures completed online. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Individual differences in how negative affect is experienced and responded to, represented by affective lability and negative urgency, predicted problem drinking above and beyond trait negative affect, and trait negative affect had no incremental predictive power. Additionally, affective lability predicted increases in negative urgency, but the opposite was not true. A focus on characteristic ways in which individuals experience and respond to negative affect, rather than negative affect itself, may improve risk assessment and clarify the etiology of problem drinking. Continued work toward the development of comprehensive affect-based risk models for problem drinking is needed.

Citing Articles

The role of parental maladaptive emotion socialization in the risk process for negative urgency and drinking behavior in adolescence.

Atkinson E, Miller L, Smith G J Adolesc. 2024; 96(5):1012-1021.

PMID: 38467519 PMC: 11586849. DOI: 10.1002/jad.12312.

References
1.
Berg J, Latzman R, Bliwise N, Lilienfeld S . Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychol Assess. 2015; 27(4):1129-46. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000111. View

2.
Simons J . Differential prediction of alcohol use and problems: the role of biopsychological and social-environmental variables. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004; 29(4):861-79. DOI: 10.1081/ada-120026265. View

3.
Atkinson E, Ortiz A, Smith G . Affective Risk for Problem Drinking: Reciprocal Influences Among Negative Urgency, Affective Lability, and Rumination. Curr Drug Res Rev. 2019; 12(1):42-51. DOI: 10.2174/2589977511666191021105154. View

4.
McGrath R . Conceptual complexity and construct validity. J Pers Assess. 2005; 85(2):112-24. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_02. View

5.
De Bellis M, Clark D, Beers S, Soloff P, Boring A, Hall J . Hippocampal volume in adolescent-onset alcohol use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2000; 157(5):737-44. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.737. View