» Articles » PMID: 33960931

Persistent Effects of Pair Bonding in Lung Cancer Cell Growth in Monogamous

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 May 7
PMID 33960931
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidemiological evidence suggests that social interactions and especially bonding between couples influence tumorigenesis, yet whether this is due to lifestyle changes, homogamy (likelihood of individuals to marry people of similar health), or directly associated with host-induced effects in tumors remains debatable. In the present study, we explored if tumorigenesis is associated with the bonding experience in monogamous rodents at which disruption of pair bonds is linked to anxiety and stress. Comparison of lung cancer cell spheroids that formed in the presence of sera from bonded and bond-disrupted deer mice showed that in monogamous and , but not in polygamous , the disruption of pair bonds altered the size and morphology of spheroids in a manner that is consistent with the acquisition of increased oncogenic potential. In vivo, consecutive transplantation of human lung cancer cells between , differing in bonding experiences (n = 9 for bonded and n = 7 for bond-disrupted), and nude mice showed that bonding suppressed tumorigenicity in nude mice (p<0.05), suggesting that the protective effects of pair bonds persisted even after bonding ceased. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering indicated that the transcriptomes of lung cancer cells clustered according to the serum donors' bonding history while differential gene expression analysis pointed to changes in cell adhesion and migration. The results highlight the pro-oncogenic effects of pair-bond disruption, point to the acquisition of expression signatures in cancer cells that are relevant to the bonding experiences of serum donors, and question the ability of conventional mouse models to capture the whole spectrum of the impact of the host in tumorigenesis.

Citing Articles

Nontraditional models as research tools: the road not taken.

Kiaris H Trends Mol Med. 2024; 30(10):924-931.

PMID: 39069395 PMC: 11466687. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.07.005.


Optimal conditions, experimentation and drug testing.

Kiaris H Lab Anim (NY). 2024; 53(8):187-188.

PMID: 39009860 DOI: 10.1038/s41684-024-01412-4.


Pair bonding and disruption impact lung transcriptome in monogamous Peromyscus californicus.

Naderi A, Liles K, Burns T, Chavez B, Huynh-Dam K, Kiaris H BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):789.

PMID: 38114920 PMC: 10729396. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09873-6.


The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives.

Blumenthal S, Young L Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 37372130 PMC: 10295201. DOI: 10.3390/biology12060844.


Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior: From Neural Circuits to Clinical Opportunities.

Rigney N, de Vries G, Petrulis A, Young L Endocrinology. 2022; 163(9).

PMID: 35863332 PMC: 9337272. DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqac111.


References
1.
Kaza V, Farmaki E, Havighorst A, Crossland J, Chatzistamou I, Kiaris H . Growth of human breast cancers in . Dis Model Mech. 2018; 11(1). PMC: 5818077. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.031302. View

2.
Vidman L, Kallberg D, Ryden P . Cluster analysis on high dimensional RNA-seq data with applications to cancer research - An evaluation study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0219102. PMC: 6894875. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219102. View

3.
Wright E, Parks T, Alexander J, Supra R, Trainor B . Activation of kappa opioid receptors in the dorsal raphe have sex dependent effects on social behavior in California mice. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 351:83-92. PMC: 6120584. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.05.011. View

4.
Lukas D, Clutton-Brock T . The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science. 2013; 341(6145):526-30. DOI: 10.1126/science.1238677. View

5.
Scribner J, Vance E, Protter D, Sheeran W, Saslow E, Cameron R . A neuronal signature for monogamous reunion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(20):11076-11084. PMC: 7245077. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917287117. View