» Articles » PMID: 33960183

Drawbacks and Aftermath of the Affordable Care Act: Ex-ante Moral Hazard and Inequalities in Health Care Access

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 7
PMID 33960183
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Following the introduction of the Affordable Care Act, various studies have tried to identify the effects of the Reform, without reaching a clear consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether expansion of the Medicaid program has led to less inequality in access to health care and to a higher level of ex-ante moral hazard.

Design And Methods: The analysis was conducted on two-year longitudinal data (2014-2015) regarding a cohort of 15,898 individuals from a Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). After a data cleaning procedure, a sample of 9,255 individuals was selected for the inequality part of the study and 2,307 for the ex-ante moral hazard analysis. Propensity score matching with nearest-neighbour and kernel matching algorithms, difference-in-difference models and concentration index, corrected according to Erreygers methodology, were adopted.

Results: The analysis showed that disparities were reduced between social classes although the ex-ante moral hazard is a real problem with the Affordable Care Act since individuals covered by public insurance tended to abuse the public service. Among those who benefited from the Act, a reduction in preventive behaviours was observed: there was an increase in smoking and a decrease in level of physical activity. As far as concerns access to health care, there was a decrease in inequality in emergency visits, inability to get care and getting care when needed among beneficiaries of the Reform.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the extension of Medicaid has had a dual effect of reducing disparities in access to health care but, at the same time, it seems to have induced people to take less care of themselves.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of strategies used for controlling consumer moral hazard in health systems.

Koohi Rostamkalaee Z, Jafari M, Gorji H BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1260.

PMID: 36258192 PMC: 9580205. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08613-y.

References
1.
Dimick J, Ryan A . Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014; 312(22):2401-2. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153. View

2.
Simon K, Soni A, Cawley J . The Impact of Health Insurance on Preventive Care and Health Behaviors: Evidence from the First Two Years of the ACA Medicaid Expansions. J Policy Anal Manage. 2017; 36(2):390-417. DOI: 10.1002/pam.21972. View

3.
Cotti C, Nesson E, Tefft N . Impacts of the ACA Medicaid expansion on health behaviors: Evidence from household panel data. Health Econ. 2018; 28(2):219-244. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3838. View

4.
Cossrow N, Falkner B . Race/ethnic issues in obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89(6):2590-4. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-0339. View

5.
Baicker K, Taubman S, Allen H, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse J . The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(18):1713-22. PMC: 3701298. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212321. View