» Articles » PMID: 33959557

Current Status of Therapeutic Choice and Feasibility for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Aged ≥ 70 Years: A Nationwide Cancer Registry Analysis

Overview
Date 2021 May 7
PMID 33959557
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The opportunities for examining elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have increased. We investigated the treatment of HCC for elderly patients and the overall survival associated with each treatment modality.

Methods: From January 2003 to December 2005 (n=578, period I) and January 2008 to December 2014 (n=2428, period II), the National Cancer Center and Korean Liver Cancer Association collected clinical data of 3006 patients with HCC aged ≥70 years old at 54 medical centers in Korea. We analyzed the treatment modalities and overall survival for patients with HCC aged ≥70 years.

Results: The mean age, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score and proportion of male patients were not different between period I and period II (74 years, 6.6, 10.4 and 70.1% vs 76 years, 6.2, 9.9 and 67.3%). TNM stage II and BCLC stage A were most commonly noted in periods I and II (44.3% and 49.1% vs 40.4% and 40.2%). Transarterial therapy was the most commonly used treatment modality according to age in both periods. Surgical resection was associated with significant superior overall survival compared to local ablation and transarterial therapy (p<0.001). After propensity score matching between surgical resection and transarterial therapy in period II, surgical resection was associated with more favorable overall survival outcomes (median: 39 months vs 86 months, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Transarterial therapy was the most commonly used treatment modality for patients with HCC aged ≥70 years. However, surgical resection led to significantly higher overall survival rates compared to other treatment modalities.

Citing Articles

Partial Hepatectomy and Ablation for Survival of Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Bayesian Emulation Analysis.

Wang J, Im Y, Wang R, Ma S Life (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929645 PMC: 11204969. DOI: 10.3390/life14060661.


TACE sequential MWA guided by cone-beam computed tomography in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma under the hepatic dome.

Li Z, Xu K, Zhou X, Jiao D, Han X BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):600.

PMID: 37386361 PMC: 10308704. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11066-z.


Nationwide Trends and the Influence of Age and Gender in the In-Patient Care of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Germany between 2010 and 2020.

Decker J, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Luitjens J, Kroencke T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37345128 PMC: 10216796. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102792.

References
1.
Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K, Tamaki N, Hirayama I, Tanaka T, Sato M . Effect of aging on risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2010; 52(2):518-27. DOI: 10.1002/hep.23691. View

2.
Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju T, Al Lami F, Alam T, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Allen C . Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(11):1553-1568. PMC: 6248091. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706. View

3.
Kim B, Kim D, Han K, Seong J . Changes in real-life practice for hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Republic of Korea over a 12-year period: A nationwide random sample study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223678. PMC: 6797085. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223678. View

4.
Cho S, Yoon J, Hwang S, Lee H . Do young hepatocellular carcinoma patients with relatively good liver function have poorer outcomes than elderly patients?. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22(8):1226-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04914.x. View

5.
Nozawa A, Kubo S, Takemura S, Sakata C, Urata Y, Nishioka T . Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in super-elderly patients aged 80 years and older in the first decade of the 21st century. Surg Today. 2014; 45(7):851-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0994-1. View