» Articles » PMID: 3395526

Reproducibility of Cardiac Output Measurement by Cross Sectional and Doppler Echocardiography

Overview
Journal Br Heart J
Date 1988 Jun 1
PMID 3395526
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The variability of Doppler echocardiographic estimation of cardiac output at the aortic orifice was investigated in eight healthy subjects. Cross sectional echocardiograms of the aortic orifice and aortic Doppler velocities were recorded and measured by four echocardiographers. Between subject variability was significantly larger than within subject variability for all variables. Variability owing to different echocardiographers and different measurement times was small compared with total variability. Coefficients of variation for aortic annular diameter, aortic velocity integral, and heart rate were 4.1%, 6.4%, and 5.0% respectively. The coefficient of variation for cardiac output was 8.8% and the 95% confidence interval for measurement of cardiac output by the Doppler method was 4.45 to 6.35 l/min. One echocardiographer reanalysed all the recordings and the results showed that recording the echocardiograms introduces a significantly larger source of error than measuring them. Thus serial measurements of cardiac output by the Doppler method can be performed with acceptable reproducibility; this indicates that the technique can be accurately applied in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Precision of Echocardiographic Measurements.

Pillai B, Salerno M, Schnittger I, Cheng S, Ouyang D J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024; 37(5):562-563.

PMID: 38199333 PMC: 11688108. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.01.001.


Pilot Study: Estimation of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output from Pulse Wave Velocity.

Obata Y, Mizogami M, Nyhan D, Berkowitz D, Steppan J, Barodka V PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0169853.

PMID: 28060961 PMC: 5218503. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169853.


Unreliable Tracking Ability of the Third-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ System for Changes in Stroke Volume after Fluid Administration in Patients with High Systemic Vascular Resistance during Laparoscopic Surgery.

Chin J, Kim W, Choi J, Han Y, Kim S, Choi W PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0142125.

PMID: 26529592 PMC: 4631474. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142125.


Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy.

McIntyre J, Ellyett K, Mitchell E, Quill G, Thompson J, Stewart A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15:70.

PMID: 25886289 PMC: 4389339. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0504-5.


Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.

Nguyen H, Banta D, Stewart G, Kim T, Bansal R, Anholm J J Clin Monit Comput. 2010; 24(3):237-47.

PMID: 20563629 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-010-9240-6.


References
1.
Fraser C, Light L, Shinebourne E, Buchthal A, Healy M, Beardshaw J . Transcutaneous aortovelography: reproducibility in adults and children. Eur J Cardiol. 1976; 4(2):181-9. View

2.
GREENFIELD Jr J, Patel D . Relation between pressure and diameter in the ascending aorta of man. Circ Res. 1962; 10:778-81. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.10.5.778. View

3.
Huntsman L, STEWART D, Barnes S, Franklin S, Colocousis J, Hessel E . Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation. 1983; 67(3):593-602. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.67.3.593. View

4.
Ihlen H, Amlie J, Dale J, Forfang K, NITTER-HAUGE S, Otterstad J . Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1984; 51(1):54-60. PMC: 482313. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.51.1.54. View

5.
Chandraratna P, Nanna M, Mckay C, Nimalasuriya A, Swinney R, Elkayam U . Determination of cardiac output by transcutaneous continuous-wave ultrasonic Doppler computer. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53(1):234-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90718-5. View