» Articles » PMID: 33950465

Patient-caregiver Agreement and Test-retest Reliability of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in Paediatric Patients with Haematological Malignancies

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 May 5
PMID 33950465
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2019, the EuroQol Group developed a 'beta' 5-level version of EQ-5D-Y (Y-5L) by increasing the number of descriptive levels to five for each health dimension, as compared to the standard 3-level EQ-5D-Y (Y-3L).

Objective: To assess patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability of the Y-5L and Y-3L in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies.

Methods: Paediatric inpatients aged 8-17 years were interviewed with the Y-5L and Y-3L questionnaires twice, while their caregivers were interviewed at the same time using the proxy versions of the questionnaires. Patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability were assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC1) for EQ-5D dimensions and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the EQ VAS.

Results: Ninety-six patient-caregiver dyads participated in the study. Patient-caregiver agreement on the EQ-5D-Y descriptive system was moderate to good for both the Y-3L and Y-5L, but poor on the EQ VAS. Test-retest reliability of the descriptive system was good to very good for the Y-3L and moderate to good for the Y-5L in children, and fair to good for both versions of EQ-5D-Y in proxies. The EQ VAS showed good test-retest reliability in both children and caregivers. In a subgroup analysis of results in younger patients aged 8-10 years, patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability were also observed to range from moderate to very good.

Conclusion: Both the Y-3L and Y-5L descriptive systems showed acceptable patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability when used to assess the HRQoL of children and adolescents with haematological malignancies, including in younger patients.

Citing Articles

How does a preference-based generic health-related quality of life measure perform in patients with a rare disease? Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y proxy version among underage patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Liang W, Cao S, Suo Y, Zhang L, Yang L, Wang H Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025; 20(1):71.

PMID: 39948669 PMC: 11827137. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-025-03590-x.


How do children understand and respond to the EQ-5D-Y-3L? A mixed methods study in a community-based sample of 6-12-year-olds.

Khanna D, Lay K, Khadka J, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Ratcliffe J Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):105.

PMID: 39633400 PMC: 11619400. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02320-4.


Long-term distress throughout one's life: health-related quality of life, economic and caregiver burden of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 in China.

Liang W, Cao S, Suo Y, Zhang L, Yang L, Wang P Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1398803.

PMID: 39234078 PMC: 11371622. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398803.


Assessing the reliability of a novel cancer-specific multi-attribute utility instrument (FACT-8D) and comparing its validity to EQ-5D-5L in colorectal cancer patients.

Cao Y, Zhang H, Luo N, Li H, Cheng L, Huang W Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(12):3309-3322.

PMID: 39225938 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03774-1.


Validation of the EQ-5D-Y-5L parent-proxy version among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Ohinmaa A, Wen J, Currie G, Benseler S, Swart J, Vastert S Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(10):2677-2691.

PMID: 39141175 PMC: 11452410. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03682-4.


References
1.
Idler E, Benyamini Y . Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997; 38(1):21-37. View

2.
Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, Gwet K . A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:61. PMC: 3643869. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-61. View

3.
Perez Sousa M, Olivares Sanchez-Toledo P, Gusi Fuerte N . Parent-child discrepancy in the assessment of health- related quality of life using the EQ-5D-Y questionnaire. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017; 115(6):541-546. DOI: 10.5546/aap.2017.eng.541. View

4.
Kreimeier S, Greiner W . EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set. Value Health. 2019; 22(1):31-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.001. View

5.
Chen G, Ratcliffe J . A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015; 33(10):1013-28. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0286-7. View