Thumb Carpometacarpal Palmar and Radial Abduction in Adults with Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Pain: Inter-rater Reliability and Precision of the Inter-metacarpal Distance Method

Overview

Journal J Hand Ther

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2021 May 5

PMID 33947615

Authors

Corey McGee

Virginia OBrien

Jennifer Johnson

Katherine Wall

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Psychometric study of inter-rater reliability.

Introduction: Functional use of the thumb can be limited in individuals with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis(OA), especially in the presence of a thumb adduction contracture. Goniometry is a common method of assessing palmar and radial abduction of the thumb base and can be used as a method of determining effectiveness of an intervention for adduction contracture. However, goniometry for the assessment of these motions has been shown to have low to moderate reliability. The intermetacarpal distance (IMD) measurement method has been shown to be the most reliable for measuring CMC palmar abduction in individuals with healthy hands but has not been studied in persons with thumb CMC OA.

Purposes: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability and precision of the inter-metacarpal distance method for measuring palmar and radial abduction in persons with symptoms of thumb CMC OA.

Methods: Two trained hand therapists utilized the IMD method to measure palmar and radial abduction in the affected hands of 22 subjects (28 thumbs) with a physician-confirmed diagnosis or positive provocative test consistent with a diagnosis of thumb CMC OA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-rater reliability of the IMD method. To determine the precision of the measurements, the standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and MDC percent were calculated. Findings were supplemented with descriptive data on the IMD values as well as descriptive data on the sample.

Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for both radial and palmar abduction were found to be >.75, indicating excellent reliability. The precision of the IMD measurements were acceptable-to-excellent as evidenced by MDC% values of <30% and <10% for radial and palmar abduction respectively.

Conclusions: We present a new method for measuring thumb radial abduction. The inter-metacarpal distance method has excellent inter-rater reliability and acceptable-to-excellent precision when measuring palmar and radial abduction in individuals with or suspected to have thumb CMC OA. Currently, it is the most reliable tool for measuring thumb abduction.

References

Gabel C, Michener L, Burkett B, Neller A . The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Hand Ther. 2006; 19(3):328-48. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.001. View

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Katz J, Wright J . A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(12):1204-17. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00407-3. View

De Kraker M, Selles R, Schreuders T, Hovius S, Stam H . The Pollexograph: a new device for palmar abduction measurements of the thumb. J Hand Ther. 2009; 22(3):271-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2008.12.001. View

Model Z, Liu A, Kang L, Wolfe S, Burket J, Lee S . Evaluation of Physical Examination Tests for Thumb Basal Joint Osteoarthritis. Hand (N Y). 2016; 11(1):108-12. PMC: 4920516. DOI: 10.1177/1558944715616951. View

Smidt N, van der Windt D, J Assendelft W, Mourits A, Deville W, de Winter A . Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(8):1145-50. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33728. View

Gravas E, Osteras N, Nossum R, Eide R, Klokkeide A, Matre K . Does occupational therapy delay or reduce the proportion of patients that receives thumb carpometacarpal joint surgery? A multicentre randomised controlled trial. RMD Open. 2019; 5(2):e001046. PMC: 6861078. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001046. View

Kjeken I, Dagfinrud H, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Uhlig T, Kvien T . Activity limitations and participation restrictions in women with hand osteoarthritis: patients' descriptions and associations between dimensions of functioning. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64(11):1633-8. PMC: 1755278. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.034900. View

Gelberman R, Boone S, Osei D, Cherney S, Calfee R . Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis: A Prospective Clinical Evaluation of the Thumb Adduction and Extension Provocative Tests. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(7):1285-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.012. View

Pellegrini Jr V . The ABJS 2005 Nicolas Andry Award: osteoarthritis and injury at the base of the human thumb: survival of the fittest?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 438:266-76. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000176968.28247.5c. View

10.

Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, Buchbinder R, Hobby K, Roth J . Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: Development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002; 10(11):855-62. DOI: 10.1053/joca.2002.0837. View

11.

Murugkar P, Wim Brandsma J, Anderson A, Gurung K, Pun Y . Reliability of thumb web measurements. J Hand Ther. 2004; 17(1):58-63. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2003.10.008. View

12.

Ferreira-Valente M, Pais-Ribeiro J, Jensen M . Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011; 152(10):2399-2404. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005. View

13.

Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus E, Kavchak A . Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manip Ther. 2013; 20(3):160-6. PMC: 3419574. DOI: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000001. View

14.

OBrien V, Giveans M . Effects of a dynamic stability approach in conservative intervention of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a retrospective study. J Hand Ther. 2012; 26(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.10.005. View

15.

Chesworth B, Hamilton C, Walton D, Benoit M, Blake T, Bredy H . Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. Physiother Can. 2014; 66(3):243-53. PMC: 4130402. DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2013-45. View

16.

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

17.

Hallgren K . Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012; 8(1):23-34. PMC: 3402032. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023. View

18.

Walter S, Eliasziw M, Donner A . Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998; 17(1):101-10. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::aid-sim727>3.0.co;2-e. View

19.

Haley S, Fragala-Pinkham M . Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(5):735-43. View

20.

De Kraker M, Selles R, Schreuders T, Stam H, Hovius S . Palmar abduction: reliability of 6 measurement methods in healthy adults. J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34(3):523-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.028. View