» Articles » PMID: 33946622

Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models

Abstract

Permeation assays are important for the development of topical formulations applied on buccal mucosa. Swine buccal and esophageal epithelia are usually used as barriers for these assays, while frozen epithelia have been used to optimize the experimental setup. However, there is no consensus on these methods. In transdermal studies, barrier integrity has been evaluated by measuring electrical resistance (ER) across the skin, which has been demonstrated to be a simple, fast, safe, and cost-effective method. Therefore, the aims here were to investigate whether ER might also be an effective method to evaluate buccal and esophageal epithelium mucosa integrity for in vitro permeation studies, and to establish a cut-off ER value for each epithelium mucosa model. We further investigated whether buccal epithelium could be substituted by esophageal epithelium in transbuccal permeation studies, and whether their permeability and integrity were affected by freezing at -20 °C for 3 weeks. Fresh and frozen swine buccal and esophageal epithelia were mounted in Franz diffusion cells and were then submitted to ER measurement. Permeation assays were performed using lidocaine hydrochloride as a hydrophilic drug model. ER was shown to be a reliable method for evaluating esophageal and buccal epithelia. The esophageal epithelium presented higher permeability compared to the buccal epithelium. For both epithelia, freezing and storage led to decreased electrical resistivity and increased permeability. We conclude that ER may be safely used to confirm tissue integrity when it is equal to or above 3 kΩ for fresh esophageal mucosa, but not for buccal epithelium mucosa. However, the use of esophageal epithelium in in vitro transmucosal studies could overestimate the absorption of hydrophilic drugs. In addition, fresh samples are recommended for these experiments, especially when hydrophilic drugs are involved.

Citing Articles

Impact of Storage on In Vitro Permeation and Mucoadhesion Setup Experiments Using Swine Nasal Mucosa.

de Araujo J, Augusto G, Pestana A, Groppo F, Rodrigues F, Novaes P AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024; 26(1):7.

PMID: 39638952 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-024-03002-6.


Assessing α-Bisabolol as a Transmucosal Permeation Enhancer of Buccal Local Anesthetics.

do Couto R, Thomaz D, Duarte M, Lopez R, Pedrazzi V, de Freitas O Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39339234 PMC: 11434793. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16091198.


Buccal Permeation of Polysaccharide High Molecular Weight Compounds: Effect of Chemical Permeation Enhancers.

Fantini A, Giulio L, Delledonne A, Pescina S, Sissa C, Nicoli S Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36678758 PMC: 9864332. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010129.


In Vitro Release, Mucosal Permeation and Deposition of Cannabidiol from Liquisolid Systems: The Influence of Liquid Vehicles.

Tabboon P, Pongjanyakul T, Limpongsa E, Jaipakdee N Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 36145536 PMC: 9503133. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091787.


Polymeric Micelles Enhance Mucosal Contact Time and Deposition of Fluocinolone Acetonide.

Limsitthichaikoon S, Soontaranon S, Hanpramukkun N, Thumanu K, Priprem A Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(11).

PMID: 35683926 PMC: 9182893. DOI: 10.3390/polym14112247.


References
1.
Gleeson J, McCartney F . Striving Towards the Perfect In Vitro Oral Drug Absorption Model. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019; 40(10):720-724. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.07.010. View

2.
Franz-Montan M, Serpe L, Martinelli C, da Silva C, Dos Santos C, Novaes P . Evaluation of different pig oral mucosa sites as permeability barrier models for drug permeation studies. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015; 81:52-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.09.021. View

3.
Li S, Peck K . Passive and iontophoretic transport through the skin polar pathway. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2013; 26(4-6):243-53. DOI: 10.1159/000351926. View

4.
Praca F, Medina W, Eloy J, Petrilli R, Campos P, Ascenso A . Evaluation of critical parameters for in vitro skin permeation and penetration studies using animal skin models. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017; 111:121-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.09.034. View

5.
Majid H, Bartel A, Burckhardt B . Development, validation and standardization of oromucosal ex-vivo permeation studies for implementation in quality-controlled environments. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020; 194:113769. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113769. View