» Articles » PMID: 33937911

Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements from Two Prototype Assays: The Abbott I-STAT and ARCHITECT Assays

Abstract

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) may aid in the evaluation of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this analysis was to compare GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using a handheld device compared with a core laboratory platform. We analyzed plasma samples from patients with TBI and healthy controls enrolled in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) cohort study. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in each subject using prototype assays, first with the Abbott i-STAT™ handheld device, and second with the Abbott ARCHITECT platform. We then quantified the agreement in biomarker values obtained using these two methods. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured twice in 570 and 572 samples, respectively. GFAP values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 143.3 [interquartile range (IQR): 19.8-925.8] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 116.0 [IQR: 9.2-856.5] pg/mL). GFAP values from the two platforms were strongly correlated ( = 0.985). Similarly, UCH-L1 values measured by the ARCHITECT platform (median 163.9 [IQR: 82.5-412.4] pg/mL) were higher than values measured by the i-STAT (median 122.5 [IQR: 63.0-297.3] pg/mL). UCH-L1 values from the two platforms were strongly correlated ( = 0.933). Passing-Bablok regression equations were developed to estimate the relationship between the two platforms, specifically to predict i-STAT values from the ARCHITECT platform. GFAP and UCH-L1 values measured using the prototype assays on the Abbott i-STAT and ARCHITECT platforms are strongly correlated and values from either platform may be converted to the other.

Citing Articles

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein's Usefulness as an Astrocyte Biomarker Using the Fully Automated LUMIPULSE System.

Kamada J, Hamanaka T, Oshimo A, Sato H, Nishii T, Fujita M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39594187 PMC: 11593324. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222520.


The effects of exercise, heat-induced hypo-hydration and rehydration on blood-brain-barrier permeability, corticospinal and peripheral excitability.

Uddin N, Scott J, Nixon J, Patterson S, Kidgell D, Pearce A Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 125(2):535-550.

PMID: 39340668 PMC: 11829906. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05616-x.


Development and Analytical Validation of a Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Paper Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Detection of the Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarker.

Tan W, Hang Y, Wang A, Wang J, Wigginton J, Muehlschlegel S ACS Omega. 2024; 9(36):37965-37972.

PMID: 39281897 PMC: 11391534. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04685.


Early GFAP and UCH-L1 point-of-care biomarker measurements for the prediction of traumatic brain injury and progression in patients with polytrauma and hemorrhagic shock.

Sperry J, Luther J, Okonkwo D, Vincent L, Agarwal V, Cotton B J Neurosurg. 2024; :1-10.

PMID: 39076152 PMC: 11174922. DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.JNS232569.


Comparison of GFAP and UCH-L1 Measurements Using Two Automated Immunoassays (i-STAT and Alinity) for the Management of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Preliminary Results from a French Single-Center Approach.

Oris C, Khatib-Chahidi C, Pereira B, Bailly Defrance V, Bouvier D, Sapin V Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(8).

PMID: 38674124 PMC: 11049915. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084539.


References
1.
Yue J, Yuh E, Korley F, Winkler E, Sun X, Puffer R . Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18(10):953-961. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30282-0. View

2.
Diaz-Arrastia R, Wang K, Papa L, Sorani M, Yue J, Puccio A . Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. J Neurotrauma. 2013; 31(1):19-25. PMC: 3880090. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3040. View

3.
Papa L, Brophy G, Welch R, Lewis L, Braga C, Tan C . Time Course and Diagnostic Accuracy of Glial and Neuronal Blood Biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Large Cohort of Trauma Patients With and Without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Neurol. 2016; 73(5):551-60. PMC: 8805143. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0039. View

4.
Harder R, Wei K, Vaze V, Stahl J . Simulation Analysis and Comparison of Point of Care Testing and Central Laboratory Testing. MDM Policy Pract. 2019; 4(1):2381468319856306. PMC: 6589980. DOI: 10.1177/2381468319856306. View

5.
Bazarian J, Biberthaler P, Welch R, Lewis L, Barzo P, Bogner-Flatz V . Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17(9):782-789. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30231-X. View