» Articles » PMID: 33937715

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Arthroplasty and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Elderly Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

Overview
Journal OTA Int
Date 2021 May 3
PMID 33937715
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Currently, there are 2 mainstream treatments for displaced femoral neck fracture, including internal fixation and arthroplasty. However, there are still some controversial problems as to which treatment should be primarily chosen.

Methods: The relevant studies comparing arthroplasty with internal fixation were searched in the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Finally, 31 relevant randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The quality of studies was evaluated and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. We also assessed the heterogeneity among studies and publication bias via the I-squared index and forest plots.

Results: There was no significant difference between arthroplasty and internal fixation groups in patient mortality at both short-term and long-term points. However, patients treated with arthroplasty showed significantly lowered risks of reoperation both at short-term (5.6% vs 31.5%; relative risks (RR)  = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.13-0.28;  < .00001) and long-term follow-up (9.5% vs 45.9%; RR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17-0.33;  < .00001). Similarly, arthroplasty-treated patients demonstrated a significant decrease in the risk of postoperation complications at short-term (10.3% vs 34.4%; RR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.24-0.57;  < .00001) and long-term follow-up (11.7% vs 42.5%; RR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.16-0.57;  < .0002). Besides, patients in the arthroplasty group were associated with better alleviation of pain postoperation (18.3% vs 31.1%; RR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.33-0.78;  = .002).In trial sequence analyses, all cumulative Z curves except that of mortality crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundaries and conventional boundaries, and required information size has been reached.

Conclusions: Arthroplasty leads to a lower rate of reoperation, a reduced risk of complications, and a better alleviation of postoperation pain both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Most importantly, and according to trial sequence analyses, more than enough evidence has been achieved that arthroplasty does show better outcomes than internal fixation in terms of reoperation rate, complications, and postoperation pain.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Incidence and Risk Factors of Pulmonary Complications Following Femur Fracture Surgery in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.

Chai J, Kang J, Seo W, Kang H, Koo H, Oh H Clin Interv Aging. 2024; 19:1843-1854.

PMID: 39529993 PMC: 11552395. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S481641.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal femoral nail versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Kutlu G, Akbulut Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):507.

PMID: 39192359 PMC: 11348573. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04941-3.


Bone remodeling and cortical thinning distal to the femoral stem: a retrospective review.

Messner M, Jacob R, Hagewood J, Broadfoot J, Chandler K, Medawar N Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(10):6461-6467.

PMID: 37055631 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04860-8.


Who, if anyone, may benefit from a total hip arthroplasty after a displaced femoral neck fracture?: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the HEALTH trial.

Frihagen F, Comeau-Gauthier M, Axelrod D, Bzovsky S, Poolman R, Heels-Ansdell D Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3(8):611-617.

PMID: 35909342 PMC: 9422900. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2022-0074.R1.


Is new always better: comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Schuetze K, Burkhardt J, Pankratz C, Eickhoff A, Boehringer A, Degenhart C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(6):3155-3161.

PMID: 35867115 PMC: 10191950. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04551-w.


References
1.
Parker M, Pryor G . Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 71(5):440-6. DOI: 10.1080/000164700317381090 . View

2.
Roden M, Schon M, Fredin H . Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized minimum 5-year follow-up study of screws and bipolar hemiprostheses in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003; 74(1):42-4. DOI: 10.1080/00016470310013635 . View

3.
McInnes M, Moher D, Thombs B, McGrath T, Bossuyt P, Clifford T . Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018; 319(4):388-396. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163. View

4.
Mouzopoulos G, Stamatakos M, Arabatzi H, Vasiliadis G, Batanis G, Tsembeli A . The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options. Int Orthop. 2007; 32(3):367-73. PMC: 2323425. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0321-1. View

5.
Jonsson B, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Fredin H, Johnell O . Social function after cervical hip fracture. A comparison of hook-pins and total hip replacement in 47 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996; 67(5):431-4. DOI: 10.3109/17453679608996662. View