» Articles » PMID: 33926582

Building Impactful Systems-focused Simulations: Integrating Change and Project Management Frameworks into the Pre-work Phase

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33926582
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Healthcare organizations strive to deliver safe, high-quality, efficient care. These complex systems frequently harbor gaps, which if unmitigated, could result in harm. Systems-focused simulation (SFS) projects, which include systems-focused debriefing (SFD), if well designed and executed, can proactively and comprehensively identify gaps and test and improve systems, enabling institutions to improve safety and quality before patients and staff are placed at risk.The previously published systems-focused debriefing framework, Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) for Systems Integration (PSI), describes a systematic approach to SFD. It includes an essential "pre-work" phase, encompassing evidence-informed steps that lead up to a SFD. Despite inclusion in the PSI framework, a detailed description of the pre-work phase, and how each component facilitates change management, was limited.The goal of this paper is to elucidate the PSI "Pre-work" phase, everything leading up to the systems-focused simulation and debriefing. It describes how the integration of project and change management principles ensures that a comprehensive collection of safety and quality issues are reliably identified and captured.

Citing Articles

PEARLS debriefing for social justice and equity: integrating health advocacy in simulation-based education.

Soilis N, Kinsella E, Eppich W, Cheng A, Beavers L, Bhanji F Adv Simul (Lond). 2024; 9(1):47.

PMID: 39696521 PMC: 11658125. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00320-4.


Translational simulation revisited: an evolving conceptual model for the contribution of simulation to healthcare quality and safety.

Brazil V, Reedy G Adv Simul (Lond). 2024; 9(1):16.

PMID: 38720396 PMC: 11080180. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00291-6.


Faculty development for translational simulation: a qualitative study of current practice.

Brazil V, Purdy E, El Kheir A, Szabo R Adv Simul (Lond). 2023; 8(1):25.

PMID: 37919820 PMC: 10621189. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-023-00265-0.


Simulation changing the face of healthcare improvement: a silver lining from the COVID-19 pandemic?.

Brazil V, Dube M CJEM. 2022; 24(4):357-358.

PMID: 35699922 PMC: 9195391. DOI: 10.1007/s43678-022-00324-x.

References
1.
Dube M, Reid J, Kaba A, Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V . PEARLS for Systems Integration: A Modified PEARLS Framework for Debriefing Systems-Focused Simulations. Simul Healthc. 2019; 14(5):333-342. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000381. View

2.
Franklin B, Shebl N, Barber N . Failure mode and effects analysis: too little for too much?. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(7):607-11. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000723. View

3.
Joseph A, Rashid M . The architecture of safety: hospital design. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007; 13(6):714-9. DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1be6e. View

4.
Dube M, Shultz J, Barnes S, Pascal B, Kaba A . Goals, Recommendations, and the How-To Strategies for Developing and Facilitating Patient Safety and System Integration Simulations. HERD. 2019; 13(1):94-105. DOI: 10.1177/1937586719846586. View

5.
Brazil V . Translational simulation: not 'where?' but 'why?' A functional view of in situ simulation. Adv Simul (Lond). 2018; 2:20. PMC: 5806247. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-017-0052-3. View