» Articles » PMID: 33925425

Designing (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquito Traps: The Evolution of the Male Sound Trap by Iterative Evaluation

Overview
Journal Insects
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33925425
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Effective surveillance of (Linnaeus, Diptera: Culicidae) is critical to monitoring the impact of vector control measures when mitigating disease transmission by this species. There are benefits to deploying male-specific traps, particularly when a high level of catch-specificity is desired. Here, the rationale behind the developmental process of an entirely new trap which uses a sound lure to capture male , the male sound trap (MAST), is presented as a target product profile with findings from developmental trials of key trap components and performance. Trial results suggest that the presence of a black base associated with the trap influenced male catches as did variations in size of this base, to a degree. Trap entrance shape didn't influence catch rates, but entrance size did. No significant differences in catch rates were found when sound lures were set to intermittent or continuous playbacks, at volumes between 63-74 dB or frequencies of 450 Hz compared to 500 Hz. Additionally, adult males aged 3 days post-eclosion, were less responsive to sound lures set to 500 Hz than those 4 or 6 days old. Lastly, almost no males were caught when the MAST directly faced continual winds of 1.5 ms, but males were captured at low rates during intermittent winds, or if the trap faced away from the wind. The developmental process to optimising this trap is applicable to the development of alternate mosquito traps beyond sound traps and provides useful information towards the improved surveillance of these disease vectors.

Citing Articles

Facilitating the use of the target product profile in academic research: a systematic review.

Ibnidris A, Liaskos N, Eldem E, Gunn A, Streffer J, Gold M J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):693.

PMID: 39075460 PMC: 11288132. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05476-1.


An IoT-based smart mosquito trap system embedded with real-time mosquito image processing by neural networks for mosquito surveillance.

Liu W, Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen B, Lin A, Dai S Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1100968.

PMID: 36741759 PMC: 9895108. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1100968.


Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan.

Pan C, Cheng L, Liu W, Su M, Ho H, Liao C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:778736.

PMID: 35372249 PMC: 8968103. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.778736.

References
1.
Jakhete S, Allan S, Mankin R . Wingbeat Frequency-Sweep and Visual Stimuli for Trapping Male Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2017; 54(5):1415-1419. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjx074. View

2.
Powell J . Mosquito-Borne Human Viral Diseases: Why ?. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018; 98(6):1563-1565. PMC: 6086192. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0866. View

3.
Villarreal S, Winokur O, Harrington L . The Impact of Temperature and Body Size on Fundamental Flight Tone Variation in the Mosquito Vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): Implications for Acoustic Lures. J Med Entomol. 2017; 54(5):1116-1121. PMC: 5850351. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjx079. View

4.
Amos B, Ritchie S, Carde R . Attraction Versus Capture II: Efficiency of the BG-Sentinel Trap Under Semifield Conditions and Characterizing Response Behaviors of Male Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2020; 57(5):1539-1549. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjaa065. View

5.
Eiras A, Buhagiar T, Ritchie S . Development of the gravid Aedes trap for the capture of adult female container-exploiting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2014; 51(1):200-9. DOI: 10.1603/me13104. View