» Articles » PMID: 33924412

Quality and Utility of Information Captured by Surveillance Systems Relevant to Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33924412
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Health surveillance systems are considered vital for combatting antimicrobial resistance (AMR); however, the evidence-base on the effectiveness of these systems in providing information that can be used by healthcare professionals, or the acceptability of these systems by users, has not been reviewed. A systematic review was conducted of a number of databases to synthesise the evidence. The review identified 43 studies that met the inclusion criteria, conducted in 18 countries and used 11 attributes in their assessment of surveillance systems. The majority of systems evaluated were for monitoring the incidence of tuberculosis. The studies found that most surveillance systems were underperforming in key attributes that relate to both effectiveness and acceptability. We identified that two features of systems (ease of use and users' awareness of systems) were associated with greater acceptability and completeness of systems. We recommend prioritising these for the improvement of existing systems, as well as ensuring consistency in the definition of attributes studied, to allow a more consistent approach in evaluations of surveillance systems, and to facilitate the identification of the attributes that have the greatest impact on the utility of data produced.

Citing Articles

Editorial: World antimicrobial awareness week.

Hammoudi Halat D, Kassem I, Osman M, Manageiro V Front Public Health. 2025; 12():1543642.

PMID: 39839430 PMC: 11747619. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1543642.


Electronic information systems for One Health surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic scoping review.

Oberin M, Badger S, Faverjon C, Cameron A, Bannister-Tyrrell M BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(1).

PMID: 34983786 PMC: 8728452. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007388.

References
1.
Gimenez-Duran J, Galmes-Truyols A, Luque-Fernandez M, Bonilla-Vargas L, Bosch-Isabel C, Nicolau-Riutort A . Assessment of tuberculosis surveillance by capture-recapture in the Balearic Islands, Spain, 2005-2007. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014; 33(9):613-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2014.10.008. View

2.
Jansson A, Arneborn M, Skarlund K, Ekdahl K . Timeliness of case reporting in the Swedish statutory surveillance of communicable diseases 1998--2002. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005; 36(11-12):865-72. DOI: 10.1080/00365540410025348. View

3.
Saeed K, Bano R, Asghar R . Evaluation of the national tuberculosis surveillance system in Afghanistan. East Mediterr Health J. 2013; 19(2):200-7. View

4.
Nicolay N, Garvey P, DeLappe N, Cormican M, McKeown P . Completeness and timeliness of Salmonella notifications in Ireland in 2008: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:568. PMC: 2955005. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-568. View

5.
Auld S, Kim L, Webb E, Podewils L, Uys M . Completeness and concordance of TB and HIV surveillance systems for TB-HIV co-infected patients in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013; 17(2):186-91. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0530. View