» Articles » PMID: 33924266

Can Markerless Pose Estimation Algorithms Estimate 3D Mass Centre Positions and Velocities During Linear Sprinting Activities?

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33924266
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to accurately and non-invasively measure 3D mass centre positions and their derivatives can provide rich insight into the physical demands of sports training and competition. This study examines a method for non-invasively measuring mass centre velocities using markerless human pose estimation and Kalman smoothing. Marker (Qualysis) and markerless (OpenPose) motion capture data were captured synchronously for sprinting and skeleton push starts. Mass centre positions and velocities derived from raw markerless pose estimation data contained large errors for both sprinting and skeleton pushing (mean ± SD = 0.127 ± 0.943 and -0.197 ± 1.549 m·s, respectively). Signal processing methods such as Kalman smoothing substantially reduced the mean error (±SD) in horizontal mass centre velocities (0.041 ± 0.257 m·s) during sprinting but the precision remained poor. Applying pose estimation to activities which exhibit unusual body poses (e.g., skeleton pushing) appears to elicit more erroneous results due to poor performance of the pose estimation algorithm. Researchers and practitioners should apply these methods with caution to activities beyond sprinting as pose estimation algorithms may not generalise well to the activity of interest. Retraining the model using activity specific data to produce more specialised networks is therefore recommended.

Citing Articles

How accurately can we estimate spontaneous body kinematics from video recordings? Effect of movement amplitude on OpenPose accuracy.

Koul A, Novembre G Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):38.

PMID: 39747756 PMC: 11695451. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02546-6.


Two-step deep-learning identification of heel keypoints from video-recorded gait.

Halvorsen K, Peng W, Olsson F, Aberg A Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 63(1):229-237.

PMID: 39292381 PMC: 11695559. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03189-7.


Computer vision for kinematic metrics of the drinking task in a pilot study of neurotypical participants.

Huber J, Slone S, Bae J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20668.

PMID: 39237646 PMC: 11377576. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71470-8.


MocapMe: DeepLabCut-Enhanced Neural Network for Enhanced Markerless Stability in Sit-to-Stand Motion Capture.

Milone D, Longo F, Merlino G, DE Marchis C, Risitano G, DAgati L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38793876 PMC: 11125421. DOI: 10.3390/s24103022.


Feasibility of OpenPose markerless motion analysis in a real athletics competition.

Cronin N, Walker J, Tucker C, Nicholson G, Cooke M, Merlino S Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 5:1298003.

PMID: 38250008 PMC: 10796501. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1298003.


References
1.
Haugen T, Buchheit M . Sprint Running Performance Monitoring: Methodological and Practical Considerations. Sports Med. 2015; 46(5):641-56. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0446-0. View

2.
Linke D, Link D, Lames M . Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0199519. PMC: 6056042. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199519. View

3.
de Leva P . Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech. 1996; 29(9):1223-30. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00178-6. View

4.
Mai P, Willwacher S . Effects of low-pass filter combinations on lower extremity joint moments in distance running. J Biomech. 2019; 95:109311. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.08.005. View

5.
Napier C, Jiang X, MacLean C, Menon C, Hunt M . The use of a single sacral marker method to approximate the centre of mass trajectory during treadmill running. J Biomech. 2020; 108:109886. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109886. View